Steph Wetherell is now a CCF mat convert after testing the Nemo Switchback. Find out why.
The Nemo Switchback is a technical Closed Cell Foam (CCF) sleeping mat featuring hexagonal nodes that create more comfort than the width of the foam itself would suggest.
Steph Wetherell recommends
This was definitely more comfortable than expected, and I did feel the cold less than I anticipated.
Pros
higher R value than other foam mats
Cons
not cheap
bulky
Quick specs
Price: $59.95 / £59.99 (available from WildBounds and NEMO Equipment) Weight: 420g Type: Closed-cell foam Materials: PE Foam Dimensions: 51cm x 183cm Thickness: 2cm Rating: R value 2 Sizes: Regular, short nemoequipment.com
I was a little concerned that being plus size, the nodes might compress under my weight. However after a good amount of testing over several months, the nodes have shown no sign of squishing, likely because of the dual-density Axiotomic foam that tops a softer lower layer with a stronger and more durable top layer. The nodes are also designed so that as you concertina the mat up while folding it, they ‘egg box’ into each other, helping it fold up compactly, but it’s still bulkier than an airmat. The same nodes also aid in the warmth trapping process – the sleeping bag doesn’t compress completely under you. There’s also a metalized thermal film layer to reflect body heat.
Steph has been pleasantly surprised by the Nemo Switchback Credit: Steph Wetherell
I confess that I don’t normally sleep just on a CCF mat as I get sore hips as a side sleeper. This one was definitely more comfortable than expected, and I did feel the cold less than I anticipated.
However, I personally had more success using it as a second mat under an air mat to add some additional warmth, comfort and puncture protection. I found it made a big difference especially under a thinner mat with a low R value – adding comfort and extending the season I can use that mat for. It felt like overkill when paired with a more insulated mat, so I’d likely opt for a thinner/smaller CCF if I’m just looking for puncture protection.
Testing conditions
Steph tested her camping mats across hills and valleys in South Wales during winter and spring. She is plus-size and 5’10 tall so prefers a wider mat and sleeps cold so tends to opt for higher R-value mats. This review was published in the December 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
The Great Outdoors Reader Awards are the UK’s biggest democratic celebration of the best of outdoor culture. Fourteen years ago, we launched our first annual awards and you – our readers – have been championing the people, places and businesses that make our lives outdoors better ever since. We are, as every year, delighted and humbled to officially open The Great Outdoors Awards 2026.
Main image: Walking towards Pen y Fan, Bannau Brycheiniog | Credit: Paul Maguire/Shutterstock
Once again, The Reader Awards are open across 15 categories including the Open Outdoors award, pub of the year, campaigner of the year, brand of the year, and many more. What makes these Reader Awards different – and gives extra kudos to the winners – is that it’s you, the outdoor going public, who decide the results. Only your nominees make it onto the shortlist, and only those who win most of your votes walk away with a top accolade.
Your top nominees will be shortlisted and the results will go to a public and democratic vote. The shortlisted nominee with the most votes in each category will be announced the Winner, while those with the second and third most votes will both be Commended.
Checking the map in the Grey Corries. Credit: Jessie Leong.
From talented authors and tireless campaigners to charming campsites and cosy pubs, the shortlists in these 15 categories represent the most inspirational personalities, organisations and businesses in the outdoor world.
The Extra Mile award
Outdoor personality of the year
Campaign or campaigner of the year
The Open Outdoors award
Walkers’ pub of the year
Walkers’ café of the year
Hostel or bunkhouse of the year
Campsite of the year
Walker’s app of the year
Outdoor film or filmmaker of the year
Outdoor book of the year
Independent retailer of the year
Chain retailer of the year
Online retailer of the year
Outdoor clothing and equipment brand of the year
If you’re in need of some inspiration across categories, take a peek at which inspirational people and ground-breaking businesses won The Great Outdoors Reader Awards 2025. We hope that you’ll take the opportunity to nominate the people, places and organisations that really deserve it – maybe the overlooked, the new and emerging voices, those who have never been shortlisted before.
Please note that, in order to help ensure fairness and variety, we are asking that you do not nominate the same person, place or organisation in more than one category.
So nominate wisely – and please share the link below so others may also have their say!
Nominations close on October 31 2025 at midnight. Thank you for taking part.
There are two parts to The Great Outdoors Awards. This article announces the shortlist for the Reader Awards, which have been nominated by our readers and the outdoor public at large across 15 categories. The other part of The Great Outdoors Awards is the Gear of the Year awards which recognises the best and most innovative outdoor gear as selected by expert judges.
Hiking shoes are a good choice for anyone who likes to feel light-footed and prefers to not be weighed down by a boot that’s high on the ankle. They’re also ideal for hikes in warm and dry weather when a hiking boot might end up feeling hot and clammy. We’ve already looked at the best trail shoes for hiking, highlighting our favourite options that are designed primarily for trail running and now we’ll look into the best budget hiking shoes.
In this instance, we’re going to profile the best budget hiking shoes that are designed first and foremost for hiking, backpacking and trekking. Wondering what’s the difference between hiking shoes and trail shoes? We’ve compiled this handy trail shoes versus hiking shoes guide to help you there.
The most important thing to look for when choosing a pair of good value hiking shoes is comfort. If you can, it’s really important to try on hiking shoes before you buy them as many manufacturers build their shoes around different lasts (basically a model of what they deem to be the average shaped human foot). That means a size 10 from one brand could fit somewhat differently to another size 10 from a different brand.
On the left, Quechua’s MH500 and on the right, Halti’s Fara Low.
Other things to consider include whether you want your shoes to be waterproof or not and how much cushioning and grip you’d like. You might also want to weigh up the overall durability, the thickness of the upper and then perhaps the overall level of eco-friendliness.
When it comes to choosing hiking footwear, you do tend to get what you pay for. In fact, the saying ‘buy cheap, but twice’ is so applicable. The options we’ve selected we believe will do the job that’s required of them and, if you know how to clean your boots properly, you should be able to extend the lifespan you get out of them.
Why you can trust The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors is here to help you make the most of your time outside. We have been helping people to explore from sea to summit, valley to mountain top for over 40 years. Our gear tests remain completely impartial. If you are wary of websites that only review brands that advertise with them, or sceptical of social media accounts always singing the praises of their latest freebie, you’ve come to the right place! Our reviews rank #1 for rigour, trustworthiness, and independence, and our gear testing team is the most experienced in Britain. With over 200 years’ experience between us, we are professional mountain leaders and instructors, wildlife photographers and rangers, outdoor authors, guidebook writers and trail addicts.
Will’s pick of the best budget hiking shoes
Here are the 10 best budget hiking shoes for 2023 according to our team. We’ve selected a range of options to bring you the pairs we believe will offer a good balance of cushioning, protection, breathability, grip and longevity. Many of these are waterproof, though not all of them, and we’ll mark this out alongside each pair.
Quick List
Merrell Moab 3 | $110 | £105 (Available from merrell.com)
Quechua MH500 | $99 | £60 (Available from decathlon.com)
Columbia Crestwood | $67 | £80 (Available from gooutdoors.co.uk)
Halti Fara Low Freelock Drymaxx | $100 | £101 (Available from alpinetrek.co.uk)
Craghoppers Lite Leather | £110 (Available from matalan.co.uk)
Merrell Moab 3 Low
Price: $110 | £105 (Available from merrell.com) Weight: 28 oz | 793g (men’s pair size 9)
The Moab from Merrell has been one of their most popular hiking shoe over the years, with thousands upon thousands of hikers having relied on the various iterations of the shoe. This, the Moab 3, is the latest version, and it offers the same tried and tested design features and elements but with a new and improved look.
Those who’ve worn Moabs before will know that they have a good solid feel underfoot thanks to their midsole that’s designed to shield your feet from any sharp roots or rocks. It’s a stiff sole, but there’s still enough flex to keep you comfortable when the mileage creeps up.
The upper mixes leather for durability and synthetic mesh for breathability and there’s a decent toe bumper to protect your toes and to protect the upper materials too. The sole compound is by Vibram and will be reliable on all but the slipperiest of surfaces. At 4mm the lugs aren’t that deep or aggressive, so there will be limitations on really muddy inclines.
This particular version of the Moab doesn’t have a waterproof lining, so it’ll be best suited to hikes in warm and dry conditions where breathability is more important than rain protection.
Materials: leather and mesh upper, 100% recycled laces | Features: Kinetic Fit Advanced footbed, Vibram TC5+ outsole, Merrell Air Cushion | Waterproofing: non-waterproof though a waterproof version is available.
This budget hiking shoe from popular U.S. footwear specialists, Keen, is designed for warmer weather hiking and that means breathability has been prioritized over weather protection (in other words, it doesn’t have a waterproof membrane). The upper mixes both leather and synthetics so you can expect a good balance between durability and breathability. Admirably, the leather that’s used comes from a tannery that meets high standards in terms of sustainability and responsible production. Kudos to Keen for using an anti-odour treatment that contains no eco-hazardous chemicals too.
Those familiar with Keen shoes will know that they tend to have a nice relaxed fit around the toes to allow them to spread out and that’s true of this particular model from them. The same goes for the toe bumper – you’ve got that classic chunky one that’s basically a trademark of the brand.
The outsole features 5mm lugs so expect a good amount of grip on muddy or gravelly tracks.
Materials: LWG certified leather and mesh upper | Features: Eco anti-odor treatment, Keen Luftcore foam midsole, heel lock | Waterproofing: non-waterproof, though a waterproof version is available.
Price: £125 | International shipping available (Available from berghaus.com)
Weight: 25.89 oz | 734g (pair size 9)
This budget hiking shoe carries a lot of the same characteristics of a trail running shoe. It’s light, cushioning and will offer plenty of grip thanks to its Vibram outsole. But it’s also lined by an AQ lining, meaning it’ll keep your feet dry through wet grass and through shallow puddles.
Mesh lines most of the upper to create breathability and there’s a TPU laminate on the toe and at the base of the upper to add a bit of protection and durability.
Vegans will appreciate that there are no animal products used here. There are some good efforts towards sustainability too. The waterproof lining, for instance, is made from a bio-based material and no harmful chemicals are used to add water resistance.
Handily, the Berghaus Revolute Active comes in half sizes and is available in men’s and women’s versions.
Materials: 100% synthetic upper | Features: AQ bio-based lining, Opti-stud Vibram Eco Step outsole, Ortholite footbed | Waterproofing: AQ lining
Price: $58 | £49 (Available from regatta.com) Weight: 29.98 oz | 850g (per pair)
This has the lowest retail price of all of the budget hiking shoes on this page and, at the time of writing, it’s actually on sale so it’s going for even cheaper.
The upper features an ISOTEX membrane and seam sealing for waterproofing. This is protected by a breathable mesh that’s reinforced with TPU overlays.
Underfoot, there’s EVA foam for cushioning and shock absorption and there’s a light plate in the midsole to block out sharp roots and rocks. The outsole has fairly deep, multi-directional lugs and a slight heel cut which will give a bit of extra traction when walking downhill.
Materials: synthetic mesh and PU upper | Features: EVA footbed, TPR outsole | Waterproofing: ISOTEX waterproof membrane.
Price: £120 | $135 (Available from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 27.5 oz | 780g (per pair)
This is a good value budget hiking shoe from one of the most popular outdoor brands in the world – and one that’s especially well regarded for its footwear. It features many of the French brand’s popular technologies, including their proprietary Climasalomon waterproof membrane and Contragrip rubber outsole.
The outsole looks similar to the kind of outsole you’d find on one of Salomon’s trail running shoes. It’s specifically designed for soft trails – so anything muddy, sandy or gravelly.
Alongside the waterproof membrane, the upper also has a breathable mesh and a soft lining. It’s designed to provide a sock-like and supportive fit. There’s also an ergonomic insole that’s designed to cradle the foot and keep it comfortably in place while you’re contouring.
Materials: leather and synthetic upper | Features: Contragrip outsole, Advanced Chassis midsole, EVA foam, Ortholite insole | Waterproofing: ClimaSalomon membrane.
Price: $139 | £140 (Available from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 27.93 oz | 792g
The RRP might be fairly high but you can find this at great prices at a number of different retailers to work within your set budget. Adidas have designed this shoe with a wide range of terrain in mind. It features a rugged outsole for grip and traction on uneven surfaces, as well as a durable upper to keep your feet comfortable and protected. The shoe’s midsole is designed to provide responsive cushioning and support. It’s made from the same springy and durable Boost foam that’s utilised across the majority of Adidas’s range of sports footwear.
As for the outsole, that’s made from Continental rubber. Our testers here at The Great Outdoors have used a number of hiking shoes with this specific rubber compound and it’s always proved versatile.
Bear in mind that this particular model isn’t waterproof and the focus is instead on breathability, evidenced by the extent of mesh throughout the upper (which is made from 50% recycled materials). There is a Gore-tex version but it costs considerably more.
Materials: 50% recycled mesh upper with TPU overlays | Features: Boost midsole, Continental rubber outsole, TPU plate and EVA | Waterproofing: The model featured here isn’t waterproof but a Gore-tex version is available.
Price: £60 | $99 (Available from decathlon.com) Weight: 31.39 oz | 890g (per pair)
The Quechua MH500 walking shoes are designed for trekking and hiking over moderate trails. The upper is made from a mix of leather and synthetic mesh, a combination designed to balance both breathability and durability. A reinforced toe cap provides protection against rocks.
The midsole is made of EVA foam to provide cushioning and support, while the outsole is made of a durable rubber compound for traction on both wet and dry surfaces.
The shoes have a secure lace-up closure and a padded collar and tongue for added comfort. They also feature a removable insole, which allows for easy customization of the fit or replacement with a personal orthotic.
Materials: Polyamide Upper of 46.5% Leather and 35.6% Polyurethane, Polyester lining | Features: EVOFit last, EVA foam, 5mm lugs | Waterproofing: Quechua proprietary membrane.
Price: $67 | £80 (Available from gooutdoors.co.uk) Weight: 24.6 oz | 700g (per size 9 pair)
The Crestwood is a budget hiking shoe that’ll be best suited to light trails and country walks in warm and dry conditions.
Like many of the other shoes in this round up, this is a shoe that has an upper that’s made from a combination of leather and synthetic mesh and that means you’ll get a balance between durability and breathability. There’s no waterproof membrane here so these will feel very breathable, though there’ll be drawbacks when hiking in these in wet weather.
The outsole features Columbia’s proprietary Omni-Grip rubber compound. This is designed to provide traction on a variety of surfaces, including wet, dry, and uneven terrain. The lugs aren’t that deep or aggressive, so while you’ll get a bit of grip on muddy surfaces, there will be limitations.
You’ll find this available in men’s and women’s versions and in half sizes too.
Materials: leather, mesh, webbing | Features: Techlite midsole, Omni-Grip outsole | Waterproofing: The one in profile here isn’t waterproof but a waterproof version is available.
Price: $100 | £101 (Available from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 31.39 oz | 890g (per pair)
Halti was founded in 1976 by two brothers, Juhani and Martti Hyökyvaara, in the town of Rovaniemi, located in Finnish Lapland. They specialise in all kinds of outdoor gear from shoes to trousers, waterproof jackets and backpacks.
The Fara Low Drymax is a good budget hiking shoe that brings a lot to the table. First of all, it’s waterproofed by Halti’s proprietary membrane and also features their own GripmaxX ‘anti-slip’ sole. Instead of lacing, it has Halti’s clever Freelock system. This involves a cable that is tightened or loosened by a locking cog. Anyone who’s used this type of system before will know that it gives for a very precise and reliable fit that never comes undone when you don’t want it to.
The lugs on the outsole aren’t too deep so don’t expect a really aggressive grip on super slippy trails – it’s perhaps more suited to light defined trails. You’ve also got a removable, ergonomically-shaped insole.
The upper is almost entirely mesh with a few PU overlays for durability – at the toe for instance. It’s worth noting that 80% of this is made up of recycled content. Halti, we should point out, have good eco credentials that extend right throughout their entire line.
Materials: Polyester softshell upper made of recycled PET bottles, with PU reinforcements | Features: GripmaxX rubber sole, Phylon midsole, Freelock safety laces with disc adjustment, removable footbed | Waterproofing: DryMaxX waterproof membrane.
Price: £110 | International delivery available (Available from matalan.co.uk) Weight: 33.15 oz | 940g (per pair)
The Lite Leather by British travel and outdoors brand Craghoppers will suit trail hiking, country walking and day-to-day wear. It features lightweight leather uppers with minimal stitching and it’s waterproofed by an AquaDry waterproof membrane. What’s more, the mesh that lines the cuff of the shoe comes treated with Craghoppers’ tried and tested NosiLife treatment – that’s a permanently embedded substance that actively deters insects like ticks and mosquitos.
In the midsole there’s an EVA foam for cushioning and shock absorption. As for the outsole, you can expect a fair bit of bite from this thanks to the deep multi-directions lugs and slight heel brake for downhill traction. The rubber compound is by Vibram so you can expect versatility when it comes to grip on different types of surfaces.
Metal eyelets then round off what is a well made shoe at a very good price.
Materials: Full grain leather upper with Nosilife treatment, polyester liner | Features: Vibram outsole, metal eyelets | Waterproofing: Aquadry lining
Everyone has individual preferences when it comes to choosing the right pair of budget hiking shoes for them. By and large, however, each pair should cover some essential basics. Here’s what to look for when you’re looking to make a new purchase.
Comfort
This is the most obvious thing to look for. Obviously the best way to know if a pair of shoes will be comfortable will be to try them on in a store and walk around in them. Stores often have platforms that simulate different types of terrain and these are great for forming an idea about how you’ll get on with the shoes.
If you can’t try the shoes on before you buy them, it’s recommended that you look for shoes that are described in any customer reviews as being true to size. Looking at a shoe online, the level of breathability can be judged by the type of material used across the upper and whether there’s a waterproof membrane or not. Mesh panels are a good sign of breathability. Shoes with a membrane might be clammy if you’re mainly intending to wear them during warm and dry conditions. Any mention of ergonomic footbeds and shock absorption or foam cushioning underfoot also tend to be good indicators of comfort.
Traction
The sole on any hiking shoes is normally the main thing that sets them apart from just normal day-to-day shoes or trainers. On hiking shoes, you want an outsole that has a tread with deep lugs – kind of like on the wheel of a tractor – and a rubber compound that is sticky in the sense that it will grip onto any smooth surfaces – stuff like slimy rocks and roots. Ideally look for anything with lugs that are multi-directional and over 4mm in depth. A bit of space between the lugs is a good thing as this means they’re more likely to shed mud rather than get clogged up by it.
Weight
Many choose to wear hiking shoes instead of hiking boots because they tend to be much lighter. It’s worth remembering that the weight of your shoes is weight that’s carried and for days with big mileage every extra gramme can count. 7 oz / 200g per shoe will be at the lighter end of the scale and anything at 17 oz / 500g or over will be at the heavier end.
Waterproof or not waterproof?
There’s quite an even split between waterproof and non-waterproof hiking shoes in this gear guide. Whether you want the protection of a membrane really depends on your own preference and perhaps more importantly the type of conditions you’ll be hiking in. If you’re planning on hiking in wet weather, where puddles and wet grass will be expected, then you’ll want a pair of shoes that are lined with a membrane. Conversely, if you’re mainly going to be hiking in warm and dry conditions then unlined shoes will keep your feet cooler, less sweaty and ultimately less at risk from blisters.
Waterproof walking shoes can have their drawbacks in certain wet conditions. If you’re hiking in heavy and prolonged rain or through long, wet grass without gaiters or waterproof overtrousers, it’s likely that water will get in through the top of the shoe, and when it’s in it’ll stay in. With non-waterproof shoes, water might get in but at least it can also get out. So, if you choose waterproof hiking shoes for wet weather use, just be mindful that you’ll often need to wear them with something to block out any moisture entry at the ankle.
Lifespan
As we mentioned in the introduction, you do tend to get what you pay for with hiking shoes and hiking footwear in general. In many cases, hiking shoes that are very cheap will be quite flimsy and won’t last long. To avoid getting caught out by this, look to buy from a reputable brand, particularly one that is a footwear specialist rather than one that has a product for everything.
It’s also a good idea to look for shoes with uppers that aren’t made out of loads of different parts. The more parts there are, the more stitching there tends to be and that then means a greater risk of things starting to come apart. If your last pair of shoes wore out, have a think about where it was that the problem occurred and look for shoes that might be particularly durable – or flexible – in that specific area.
Stew Hume finds And So I Run an interesting page-turner of a personal memoir – from mile one to mile 26.
In a landscape of running-centric books that either look to inspire or repeat that recurring narrative – “I can’t believe a person like me can run” – Jamie Doward’s And So I Run offers something slightly different.
Image: Running on Brighton beach | Credit: Zoe Salt
With a background as a journalist – and the lifestyle habits that can sometimes come with the vocation – he soon discovers running that takes him out of the print-to-pint cycle.
From sea to summit, Jamie hashes out the miles. Credit: Zoe Salt
Each chapter of And So I Run is split up into the miles of a marathon. Step-by-step, Doward takes readers on his own personal journey as he dedicates years of training to breaking that famed three-hour barrier. Through the trials and tribulations of striving to achieve this goal, the author does not always shine a positive light on his mission, pointing out the occasional absurdity of this past-time with witty self-deprecation. On the cover itself, Doward describes his goal as a ‘futile quest’ – this should give you a sense of the tone he is striking.
It’s an interesting read for any runners to perhaps reflect on their own relationship with the sport. The ‘never again’ internal conversation that happens midway through many races certainly struck a chord with me and anyone who has laced up for a long run will likely recognise themselves in some of the relatable anecdotes.
A recurring theme in And So I Run is the author’s take on the ‘fight or flight’ quandary and how it relates to his running journey, in light of the notion that he used the sport to escape everyday stressors. The author offers introspection on his own younger years, his career in journalism and his experience of becoming a parent. The book is an honest account of how he used running as a coping mechanism during these times and he certainly doesn’t shy away from some of his past issues.
By the end of the book, the reader gets the sense that Doward has found some inner solace and has faced up to aspects of his life that he was ‘running’ from. But And So I Run doesn’t fall into the trap of preaching to the audience.
This is not a guide to following in the author’s own footsteps but rather is a simple, honest reflection of a personal journey running through some of our fine British landscapes and cityscapes. It is perhaps not a book to pick up if you are seeking motivation to drag yourself out of the door to run for the first time, but for those who have built up a great deal of cumulative miles over the years it’s an enjoyable page-turner – from mile one to 26.2.
And So I Run is published by Vertebrate (paperback, £14.95)
When contributors to The Great Outdoors aren’t out walking, some like to relax with a good book. Read their outdoor book reviews and discover your next adventurous tale.
Hiking is often an enjoyable experience but it can also at times be an uncomfortable experience. It can be hot or cold and it can be dry or wet. It can be tiring mentally and physically and it can be painful. And things can be made even worse too – that’s if you end up wearing a hiking shirt that’s not properly made for the conditions.
Our team here at The Great Outdoors are experienced backpackers and hikers and, over the years, each of us have come to understand what types of shirts work best for hiking and what materials and details to look out for.
If you’re looking for tips on what types of hiking shirt you should be looking for then we’ve already published an in-depth guide to choosing a hiking shirt that will help you there, but as a brief top line before we dive into the best hiking shirts, you should first and foremost focus on the fabric when you’re shopping around.
Look for lightweight and breathable materials like moisture-wicking synthetics or Merino wool, which efficiently manage perspiration and keep you dry during strenuous hikes. You should also consider a shirt’s fit as well, opting for a relaxed yet not overly baggy cut that gives freedom of movement. Ventilation features such as mesh panels or zippered vents can also enhance breathability. Sun protection is vital, so seek shirts with UPF ratings to shield your skin from harmful UV rays. Additionally, check for odour-resistant properties, particularly if you’re embarking on multi-day hikes.
Why you can trust The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors is here to help you make the most of your time outside. We have been helping people to explore from sea to summit, valley to mountain top for over 40 years. Our gear tests remain completely impartial. If you are wary of websites that only review brands that advertise with them, or sceptical of social media accounts always singing the praises of their latest freebie, you’ve come to the right place! Our reviews rank #1 for rigour, trustworthiness, and independence, and our gear testing team is the most experienced in Britain. With over 200 years’ experience between us, we are professional mountain leaders and instructors, wildlife photographers and rangers, outdoor authors, guidebook writers and trail addicts.
The best hiking shirts we’ve tested
Quick List
Best overall: Alpkit Woodsmoke (available at Decathlon)
Best for women: Paramo Socorro (available from Paramo)
Best for men: Paramo Katmai Light (available from Paramo)
Greener choice: Craghoppers Nosilife Adventure Shirt III (available from Craghoppers)
Best for winter: Fjallraven Expedition X-Latt Shirt (available from Fjallraven)
Best overall
Alpkit Woodsmoke
TGO Gear Awards winner 2023
The fit is neat but not close and the Woodsmoke layers well over any weight of baselayer. Freedom of movement is excellent with only a small amount of hem movement when you lift your arms up.
This might have the look of the kind of casual shirt that someone might wear down the pub or to a mountain film festival but it does in fact have the performance and comfort that’s required for outdoor activity. That’s why we chose this for a prize in The Great Outdoors Awards this year; it’s a shirt that has the kind of moisture wicking and temperature regulation you want when you’re out in varied conditions on the trail.
In my tests, I found that sweat would build up, especially under a backpacking pack, but the shirt managed to dry out quickly so there wasn’t a lingering dampness. To counter the risk of odour build-up that can occur with plastic-based garments, the Woodsmoke comes embedded with Polygiene, a brand of antimicrobial treatment used in textiles to prevent the growth of odour-causing bacteria.
The fit is neat but not close and the Woodsmoke layers well over any weight of baselayer. Freedom of movement is excellent with only a small amount of hem movement when you lift your arms up.
I love the big bellows chest pockets that easily hold smartphone and notebook and the wide Velcro-closed cuffs with no slits to let midges in and which allow great ventilation when open.
men: S-XXL, women: XS-XL (Socorro Shirt – no Velcro pockets)
Brand site
paramo.com
The Katmai Light has been my favourite warm weather hiking shirt for many years. I usually only wear it when I expect it to be my outer layer most of the time. I hoped that would be so on this trip, but it wasn’t to be and the shirt was worn under a waterproof jacket most of the time and a windproof jacket much of the rest. It still worked well, though I don’t think it would have been as comfortable without the BAM t-shirt under it as my arms sometimes felt a little damp and chilly. It does dry fast though.
The polyester fabric is soft and comfortable and was still like that after two weeks wear. I love the big bellows chest pockets that easily hold smartphone and notebook and the wide Velcro-closed cuffs with no slits to let midges in and which allow great ventilation when open. The sleeves can easily be rolled up too (not a feature I needed on this trip).
I’ve worn the flannel with synthetic and merino base layers and the warmth for very low bulk is excellent on cool hill days with a little sting being taken out of the wind by the dense fabric.
Pros
Comfort
Durability
Adaptability
Fabric
Cons
Slightly small pockets
Heavy
Quick specs
Price: $145 / £110 (available from EDZ) Weight: 398g Large Materials: 100% merino wool, corozo buttons Features: Full length buttoned front, buttoned cuffs, stand up shirt collar, two chest pockets Sizes: S-XXL Women’s version: no edz.co.uk
EDZ’s flannel is a thicker, densely woven fabric that fits the traditional look of their checked merino hiking shirt. It is a useful outdoor layer with a relaxed slim cut, making it suitable for wearing over a base layer or on its own. The fabric is stiff and comfortable, with smooth seams and a seven-button placket. The double-thickness cuffs have two buttons for adjustability and gusseted wrists for more arm room. The cuffs easily roll up above the elbows, and the collar is stiff enough for wind and sun protection.
The flannel compensates for the lack of stretch with a good active shape, allowing for easy scrambling without pulling out of the pack belt. It is not suitable for climbing, but for regular hill walking, mobility is good. The 100% merino fabric stays fresh without washing, allowing for extended wear and sleep. However, it takes longer to dry than a synthetic layer if sweat is overload.
The flannel provides excellent warmth for low bulk on cool hill days, with the dense fabric absorbing wind sting. With good durability, the flannel has become one of the go-to layers for many outdoor enthusiasts.
The Socorro is quite a low-key shirt, which meets the brief of being cool and practical with the minimum of fuss.
Pros
Lightweight
Tough
Cool fabric
Cons
Bulky cuffs
Quick specs
Price: $100 / £90 (available from Paramo) Weight: 156g (size medium) Materials: 100% Polyester Parameta A Light Features: Button front, hook and loop cuffs, button chest pocket and zipped napoleon pocket. Sizes: XS-XL Men’s version: no, although the Katmai has similar technology paramo-clothing.com
The Paramo Socorro is quite a low-key hiking shirt, which meets the brief of being cool and practical with the minimum of fuss. The star feature here and the reason for the “Best Buy” award is the fabric itself, Parameta A Light, which feels fresh and soft against the skin. It has a very tight weave, great for durability, sun protection and keeping biting insects at bay, and although there are no vents, the shirt is cut in a loose style that allows both airflow and freedom of movement needed for hot climates.
The discrete zipped napoleon pocket is a useful size – I don’t like the feel of heavy objects in chest pockets but will take a passport or travel documents and is completely secure. The Paramo Socorro comes in sizes XS-XL, which is quite a limited size range, but I note that my medium is too big for me in the body and sleeves, (I’m an average 12), so larger sizes may be catered for than is first apparent.
Although I tested this shirt in mild spring weather, I expect that it will perform the best in this test in hotter climates thanks to the cooling effects of the supple fabric (and I have earlier experience of Parameta A Light in this respect), and relaxed generous fit.
The main fabric of the shirt is completely recycled, getting a massive thumbs up from me, but unfortunately it is quite a stiff material, and heavier weight than the other shirts I tested
Pros
hardwearing
Nosilife treatment
Good eco credentials
Cons
Thick fabric
Bulky seams
Quick specs
Price: $106 / £80 (available from Craghoppers) Weight: 230g (size 12) Materials: 100% recycled polyamide with polyester trim Features: Button front, and cuffs, extendable collar, vents, poppered chest pockets, bicep pocket, zipped side pocket, rear vents, sleeve tabs, Nosilife treatment Sizes: 8-24 Men’s version: yes www.craghoppers.com
The Nosilife Adventure Shirt III is the Swiss Army knife of hiking shirts, absolutely packed with features – too many to list here. The headline is the Nosilife treatment, an insect repelling and antimicrobial treatment which has been updated for 2024, now from a renewable and plant based (eucalyptus) source. Its effectiveness as an insect repellent is moot because I tested in early spring on the west coast of Scotland, when bugs are minimal. In summer conditions, I believe that nothing will deter the Scottish midge for long! However, it is good at handling body odours over several days of use, which makes it a worthwhile feature for that reason alone.
I don’t really use shirt pockets but there are more than enough here if wanted – the hidden zipped side pocket is probably the most practical. The main fabric of the Nosilife Adventure Shirt III is completely recycled, getting a massive thumbs up from me, but unfortunately it is quite a stiff material, and heavier weight than the other shirts I tested, which feels uncomfortable next to the skin.
The X-Latt has something of a countrywear aesthetic but the specification says it’s designed for the hills and I had no problems taking the shirt straight into the hills last winter.
Pros
Comfort
Warmth
Adaptability
Light
Cons
Pocket placement
Quick specs
Price: $246 / £185 (available from Fjallraven) Weight: 298g Large Pros: comfort, warmth, adaptability, protection, light Cons: pocket placement Materials: 100% polyamide shell fabric, 100 polyester insulation Features: Full length buttoned front, buttoned cuffs, stand up shirt collar, insulated, two hip pockets Sizes: XS-XXL Women’s version: no; women’s equivalents in the zipped jacket and hoodie versions www.fjallraven.com
The Fjallraven Expedition X-Latt is a versatile all-day hiking shirt designed for the hills, offering excellent protection and a relaxed slim fit. The shirt has a seven button format but a longer body that covers the backside, providing extra protection on cold days. The outer shell is windproof and water-resistant, ensuring dryness in showers and light snow. The insulated fill is light and warm, based on 100-weight microfleece, providing a wide range of use all year round.
The cuffs are comfortable, but they do slip up when reaching high, making it not ideal for scrambling or using with ice axes on steeper slopes. The cuffs also have a long placket for ventilation and a collar that can be fastened at the chin for a complete seal.
The X-Latt has plastic poppers for easy use with gloves on, and there are two large low set pockets with fasteners for winter mitts and hands. The chest pocket would be a perfect addition, as the shirt is versatile and easy to wear with a pack on. Overall, the Fjallraven Expedition X-Latt is a great choice for those looking for a versatile all-day layer.
Smartwool made a great fitting shirt with an excellent fabric which is just lacking a little in its features for all round hill use.
Pros
Light
Comfortable
Excellent fabric
Cons
Collar doesn’t stand up
Small single pocket
Quick specs
Price: $145 / £109.99 (available from The Outdoor Gear Exchange) Weight: 264g Large Pros: light, comfortable, excellent fabric Cons: collar doesn’t stand up, small single pocket Materials: 56% Merino Wool, 44% Polyester Features: Full length buttoned front, buttoned cuffs, shirt collar, chest pocket Sizes: S-XXL Women’s version: no www.smartwool.co.uk
The Smartwool Long Sleeve Button Up is a soft, light, and stretchy shirt made from a merino and polyester mix, providing good odour resistance and quicker drying than pure merino fabric. The shirt maintains its shape after extended wear and washing, with some light bobbling in high wear areas but no unsightly effects. The shirt is comfortable on warmer and cooler days and has flat seams and a smooth front placket with seven buttons. The cuffs are double-thick fabric, neatly positioned under other layers, with room for a chunky watch.
The collar is well-shaped but soft, but doesn’t stand up on its own. The shirt has a relaxed slim fit in a regular Large size, making it suitable for a close-fitting base layer. However, it lacks a small chest pocket, which could be more spacious but requires a button. The shirt is suitable for buff or liner gloves, but sunglasses can slip out easily if bent or scrambled. Smartwool has created a great-fitting shirt with excellent fabric, but it lacks features for all-round hill use.
In tests, the thin polyester wicked well and dried out quickly. As is the case with most synthetic shirts – at least those like this one that don’t have anti-odor treatment – the material did get smelly after a few days without washing it. The little extension at the back of the collar is a handy feature to have on those hot days when skin cover is needed.
This polyester shirt has a 16% elastane content giving it a nice bit of stretch. The fabric also has little holes in it that allow warm air to escape from inside and cool wind to blow through, making it lovely and fresh-feeling to wear.
It has four pockets in total: two poppered chest pockets and two zipped mesh pockets tucked behind these that double as vents. These pockets are big enough to hold a folded map or a large smartphone. You can also pack up the shirt into one of the zipped pockets for convenient storage.
Our tester (5 foot 10, average build) found the size M quite loose and long.
Another shirt on our list to the best hiking shirts is the Patagonia Self Guided UPF. This is a fantastically airy shirt. In hot conditions, there isn’t anything better that we’ve tried. Made from 100% recycled ripstop polyester, the material is thin and fresh feeling and the vents across the back work well to let hot air escape and cool air in. In our tests, the wicking performance was also very impressive with the fabric lifting sweat and drying out quickly.
You also get 40+ UPF protection from this and handy storage options thanks to the button down pockets on the chest. These pockets are big enough for a wallet but not for a phone.
As is normal with polyester, this did start to smell after repeated use. It would therefore be good to see future iterations using some form of anti-odor technology, like Patagonia’s own HeiQ Pure silver-salt-based additive.
In terms of fit, our five foot 10 averagely built tester (me), said that the size M – his usual size – fitted perfectly by itself but it still also had a bit of room for a baselayer on colder days. Kudos to Patagonia for making sure this is Fair Trade Sewn too.
Merino wool is an excellent material for outdoor use; it’s warm and comfortable, it’s water and odor resistant and it’s got a good resistance to flames – so a spitting ember from the campfire won’t instantly ruin it. This has a high merino content, with the material making up 79% of the shell. Fortunately for those who don’t like the feel of wool against the skin, the interior is made from a smooth cotton, polyester and elastane lining.
Out of all the shirts in this round up, this is the warmest by far. In winter, it serves well as a thick baselayer while in summer, it can work as a mid layer – or even a jacket.
Poppers feature throughout, including across the center front, on the cuffs and on the pockets too. The pockets are quite small in depth, and not big enough for a phone, but the pleat on each one does still create some volume.
Craghoppers’ Kiwi shirt is a travel classic that’s been worn on many an Everest basecamp trek, African safari or long-distance walk.
Its main USP is that its fabric is woven in a way that make it able to fend off biting insects like mosquitoes and midges. It also provides a good degree of protection from UV rays.
The polycotton weave wicks away sweat effectively and it does also have a degree of water resistance but there is a threshold and in heavy and prolonged rain it can get saturated. The drying time is OK but it’s not as quick-drying as the shirts in this round-up that have high polyester content.
The fit is quite loose and baggy. Those who like a close fit might want to go a size down to their usual size. The pockets, center front and cuffs are all buttoned.
This is a practical shirt that offers just about everything you’d want for hiking. Made from nylon, it’s durable, UV resistant and has excellent moisture-wicking and quick-drying properties. The weave is breathable enough in itself but then there are also ventilation flaps across the back and there’s a zipped pocket on the chest that doubles as a vent too.
The center front and the cuffs are buttoned and there’s a sleeve tab that lets you fasten the sleeves when they’re rolled up. The fit is true to size and accommodates a baselayer underneath,
Credit to The North Face for using 100% recycled nylon for this too.
This shirt from German brand Jack Wolfskin comes with bluesign approval, an industry mark that recognises sustainable and ethical methods of manufacturing. Just the inner mesh that lines the vents is made from recycled materials. The rest of the shirt, however, is made from virgin polyamide and polyester.
The material is moisture regulating and very fast drying. It also offers UV protection and comes with Jack Wolfskin’s proprietary anti-odor treatment.
On the left breast, there’s a large concealed zipped pocket that’s big enough for a standard size phone.
This shirt blends nylon, polyester and spandex resulting in a material that’s UV blocking, durable but light and that’s also moisture wicking and quick-drying. It’s bluesign approved meaning it meets industry standards in sustainable and ethical manufacture.
The weight is 144g making it one of the lightest shirts in this review and thus one of the best options for those who are gram conscious.
It has two medium-sized chest pockets – these aren’t quite big enough to comfortably hold a standard sized smartphone – and there’s also a zipped security pocket underneath the pocket on the left breast.
It’s very similar to the Patagonia and The North Face shirts in this round up, although this doesn’t have the ventilation options that they offer. Still, it is a light and airy shirt overall so that’s not much of a problem.
This shirt from U.S. brand Columbia is made from 100% recycled polyester. It’s thin, light and airy, but the fabric is woven tightly enough to make it fairly hardwearing. There’s 50+ UPF protection from it which is quite high.
As you’d expect from a polyester shirt, it’s able to wick away sweat and it’ll dry quickly. Odors will start to build up if this isn’t washed frequently enough – always the downside to polyester shirts.
Other details include vents along the back of the shoulders and there’s one chest pocket that’s sealed by a popper. The center front is closed up to the sternum by buttons and finished off with poppers.
The long sleeve version of this has a sleeve tab that lets you fasten the sleeves when they’re rolled up.
The last product on our list to the best hiking shirts is the Royal Robins. At 122g this is the lightest shirt in this round up. It’s made from a recycled polyester that has a stretchiness to it making it very comfortable to wear and move around in. Again, this is another shirt with bluesign approval, so you can have peace of mind that this was ethically and sustainably manufactured. Royal Robbins is, after all, a brand with a good eco conscience. In fact, its founders Liz and Royal Robbins, were some of the earliest environmental advocates in climbing and in the outdoor industry and were the people who pioneered the “clean climbing” movement in the 60s.
The polyester fabric is breathable, fast wicking and quick-drying and the overall cut is quite loose and airy, making this a good shirt for hot temperatures.
In terms of features, there’s just the one small pocket which is sealed by a zipper.
How to choose a hiking shirt
Just like with a waterproof jacket, when choosing a the best hiking shirts it’s important to think about the conditions you’ll mainly be wearing it in. For instance, if you’ve got a winter hike coming up then it’ll be important to choose a hiking shirt that is warm, breathable and that you can layer over and/or under comfortably. In summer, on the other hand, most people will want to be looking for a shirt that’s light, airy, well-ventilated, sweat wicking and quick drying. The main thing that determines a shirts suitability to certain conditions is the fabric it’s made from, so that’s the first thing to consider when you’re shopping around.
Synthetic Fabrics: Materials like polyester and nylon are popular choices due to their lightweight nature and excellent moisture-wicking capabilities. These will keep you dry by lifting sweat away from your skin and spreading it out thinly throughout the fabric to allow for quick evaporation.
Merino Wool: This natural fiber offers good temperature regulation, keeping you cool in hot conditions and warm in colder weather. Merino wool is also known for being odour resistant, making it a great choice for multi-day hikes.
Blends: Some shirts combine synthetic fibers with merino wool, providing the benefits of both materials in a single garment. Such blends can offer enhanced moisture control, durability, and comfort. You also often find polyester and cotton blends, a material known as polycotton. Polycotton is moisture wicking and comfortable but it is slow to dry and sweat can cause odors to build up.
Gear editor Chris Townsend wearing an EDZ wool shirt. Credit: Chris Townsend
Durability
Hiking shirts should withstand the rigors of the trail. Look for shirts constructed with reinforced seams and durable materials that can withstand abrasions from backpacks or rough surfaces encountered on the hike. High-quality shirts tend to last longer, making them a worthwhile investment for frequent hikers.
Comfort
Comfort is obviously crucial for an enjoyable hiking experience. Consider the fit of the shirt – it should be neither too tight nor too loose, allowing freedom of movement without causing chafing. Additionally, look for shirts with flatlock seams or tagless designs to minimize irritation – particularly around the shoulders where you might be wearing a heavily loaded backpack.
Odor resistance
Hiking can unfortunately lead to sweat and some unpleasant odors. Merino wool and some synthetic fabrics possess natural or treated odor-resistant properties, which help maintain freshness throughout over a number of days. This becomes particularly important on multi-day hikes where regular washing may not be possible.
UV resistance
Protection from the sun’s harmful rays is crucial during hikes, especially at higher altitudes or in exposed areas. Look for shirts with a high Ultraviolet Protection Factor (UPF) rating, which indicates their effectiveness in blocking UV radiation. UPF 30 and above are recommended for optimal protection.
Insect resistance
If you’re hiking in areas prone to insects or ticks, consider shirts treated with insect-repellent coatings. These can help minimize insect bites and potential health risks. The weave is also important – shirts that are woven tightly enough will be able to block out biting insects like mosquitoes and midges.
Sustainability
If you care about your environmental footprint then look for shirts that are made with recycled content – ideally 100%. If a brand says ‘made from recycled content’ but doesn’t give a percentage then be wary, It could just be the buttons that are made from non-virgin materials! Things like the bluesign mark and Fair Trade certification are good things to look for if you want sustainable and ethical reassurance. Thing of the overall durability too; if a shirt is tough enough it could last you a lifetime, thus saving you from making extra purchases and having to send things to landfill.
Chris wearing Craghoppers. Credit: Chris Townsend
How to wash and care for your hiking shirt
Synthetic materials like polyester should be washed in cold water and dried on low heat. Merino wool shirts should be hand-washed in cold water and hung to dry. It’s important to never use fabric softeners or bleach when washing your hiking shirt. These can damage the fabric’s moisture-wicking properties. It’s a good idea to turn your hiking shirt inside out before washing to prevent abrasion which can occur from contact with other garments or the washing machine drum. This simple step helps maintain the fabric over time. For those with sensitive skin, consider using a hypoallergenic laundry detergent to prevent any skin irritation during your hiking trips.
Hiking shirts can get dirty quickly, especially if you’re hiking in muddy or dusty conditions. To remove stains, pre-treat them before washing them with a specialized stain remover or a combination of baking soda and water. For odour control, add half a cup of white vinegar to the wash cycle. This will freshen up your hiking shirt and remove any unwanted smells. Another effective way to tackle stubborn odours is by sun drying your hiking shirt. The ultraviolet rays from the sun have a natural bleaching effect which can help in eliminating bacteria and odours. Remember to turn your shirt inside out to prevent colour fading.
When you’re not wearing your hiking shirt, it’s important to store it properly. Avoid hanging it in direct sunlight, as this can damage the colour and fabric. Store your hiking shirt in a cool, dry place. If possible, fold it neatly and keep it in a drawer or chest. This will prevent any wrinkles from forming and keep your hiking shirt looking its best. Avoid storing them in plastic bags or containers which might trap moisture that can lead to mildew. A breathable cotton storage bag is a good alternative for keeping your hiking shirt in pristine condition.
Hiking shirts are an essential part of any outdoor enthusiast’s wardrobe. They are designed to keep you cool and comfortable, protecting your skin from the sun and keeping you dry during intense physical activity. However, a hiking shirt is only as good as its care. Properly washing and caring for your hiking shirt is important if you want it to last for years to come. In this article, we will give you tips and tricks on how to properly wash and care for your hiking shirt, including washing and drying instructions for different shirt materials, stain removal and odour control, and how to store your hiking shirt when not in use.
Washing and Drying Instructions for Different Shirt Materials
It’s important to know what material your hiking shirt is made of so that you can properly wash and dry it. Synthetic materials like polyester should be washed in cold water and dried on low heat. Merino wool shirts should be hand-washed in cold water and hung to dry. It’s important to never use fabric softeners or bleach when washing your hiking shirt. These can damage the fabric’s moisture-wicking properties.
It’s a good idea to turn your hiking shirt inside out before washing to prevent abrasion which can occur from contact with other garments or the washing machine drum. This simple step helps maintain the fabric over time. For those with sensitive skin, consider using a hypoallergenic laundry detergent to prevent any skin irritation during your hiking trips.
Stain Removal and Odour Control
Hiking shirts can get dirty quickly, especially if you’re hiking in muddy or dusty conditions. To remove stains, pre-treat them before washing them with a specialized stain remover or a combination of baking soda and water. For odour control, add half a cup of white vinegar to the wash cycle. This will freshen up your hiking shirt and remove any unwanted smells.
Another effective way to tackle stubborn odours is by sun drying your hiking shirt. The ultraviolet rays from the sun have a natural bleaching effect which can help in eliminating bacteria and odours. Remember to turn your shirt inside out to prevent colour fading.
How to Store Hiking Shirts When Not in Use
When you’re not wearing your hiking shirt, it’s important to store it properly. Avoid hanging it in direct sunlight, as this can damage the colour and fabric. Store your hiking shirt in a cool, dry place. If possible, fold it neatly and keep it in a drawer or chest. This will prevent any wrinkles from forming and keep your hiking shirt looking its best.
Avoid storing them in plastic bags or containers which might trap moisture that can lead to mildew. A breathable cotton storage bag is a good alternative for keeping your hiking shirt in pristine condition.
Photo by Pixabay
Other Tips for Hiking Shirt Care
To maintain your hiking shirt’s colour and fabric, avoid using hot water or high heat when washing and drying. You should also wash your hiking shirt separately from any other clothing, especially those that are heavily soiled. Finally, use a gentle, eco-friendly detergent that won’t damage the fabric’s moisture-wicking properties.
Taking care of your hiking shirt is important if you want it to last for years to come. By following these tips and tricks, you can ensure your hiking shirt stays clean, fresh, and functional. Remember to wash and dry your shirt according to its material, use stain removers and odour control methods as needed, and store it properly when not in use. With these simple steps, you can enjoy your hiking shirt for many more adventures to come.
When it comes to hiking, the saying “dress for success” takes on a whole new meaning. The right gear can really impact your comfort, performance, and overall enjoyment on the mountains. One of the most crucial pieces of your hiking wardrobe is your hiking shirt, and more specifically, the material it’s made from. This guide aims to delve deep into the world of hiking shirt materials, exploring their pros and cons, and offering insights into how to select the best one for your specific needs.
How to identify the best materials for hiking shirts
Polyester
Polyester is a synthetic fibre that is a staple in the world of sportswear, including hiking shirts. One of its standout features is its moisture-wicking ability, which helps to draw sweat away from your skin, keeping you dry and comfortable after those steep climbs.
Nylon
Nylon is another synthetic material that has found its way into outdoor apparel due to its exceptional strength and resistance to wear and tear. This makes them ideal for hiking shirts that need to withstand the rigours of outdoor activities.
Merino Wool
Merino wool is a natural fibre obtained from Merino sheep, primarily found in Australia and New Zealand. Unlike traditional wool, Merino is finer and softer, making it more comfortable against the skin. It’s highly breathable and has natural moisture-wicking and odour-resistant properties.
Pros and Cons of Each Material
Polyester
Pros
Moisture-Wicking: Polyester is great at drawing moisture away from the skin, helping you stay dry.
Quick-Drying: It dries rapidly, reducing discomfort from sweat or rain.
Affordability: Generally less expensive than natural fibres like Merino wool.
Cons
Breathability: While it wicks moisture, it’s less breathable than natural fibres, which can lead to overheating.
Odour Retention: Polyester is notorious for retaining odours, which can be a drawback on multi-day hikes.
Nylon
Pros
Durability: Nylon is incredibly strong and can withstand a lot of abuse, making it ideal for rugged terrains.
Abrasion-Resistance: It resists abrasion well, which is beneficial when carrying a backpack.
Quick-Drying: Like polyester, nylon also dries quickly.
Cons
Breathability: Nylon is less breathable compared to natural fibres.
Skin Comfort: Some people find nylon to be less comfortable against the skin, especially during prolonged wear.
Merino Wool
Pros
Breathability: Merino wool is highly breathable, allowing for excellent air circulation.
Moisture-Wicking: It naturally wicks moisture away from the skin.
Odour-Resistance: The natural properties of Merino wool make it resistant to odour, even after multiple wears.
Cons
Cost: Merino wool is generally more expensive than synthetic materials.
Durability: While comfortable, it’s less durable and tends to wear out quicker than synthetics.
Considerations for Weather and Activity Type
Photo by Courtney Hodgin
Hot Weather
In hot weather, breathability and moisture-wicking are paramount. Polyester is a solid choice due to its quick-drying properties. However, Merino wool can also be a good option because of its natural breathability and moisture-wicking abilities.
Cold Weather
For colder conditions, insulation is key. Merino wool stands out for its natural ability to keep you warm, even when wet. Its fibres create small air pockets that trap heat, providing excellent insulation.
Day Hikes
For day hikes, you can opt for any of the materials depending on your personal preference and the weather conditions. Polyester and nylon are generally more affordable and quick-drying, making them suitable for shorter activities.
Multi-Day Treks
For multi-day hikes, Merino wool is often the go-to choice. Its natural odour-resistance means you can wear it for several days without worrying about the smell, and its comfort level is unparalleled for prolonged wear.
Selecting the right material for your hiking shirt is not just a matter of personal preference; it’s a decision that can significantly affect your comfort and performance on the trail. Polyester offers versatility and is budget-friendly but may lack in breathability and odour control. Nylon provides exceptional durability but may not offer the same level of comfort as natural fibres. Merino wool, while more expensive, offers a range of natural benefits including breathability, moisture-wicking, and odour resistance.
Your final choice should be influenced by the weather conditions you’ll encounter and the type of hiking you plan to do. Whether you’re setting off on a casual day hike or embarking on a challenging multi-day trek, making an informed decision on material can make all the difference in your hiking experience.
I like this Adventure Food Quinoa Al Mexicana meal for its subtle spice level and cayenne pepper bringing a gentle heat.
The nutty quinoa pairs well with the earthy black beans and the sweetness of the sweet potato. The dish has a satisfying blend of flavours. In particular the garlic, cumin and coriander infusion became more aromatic in hot water.
Gemma Palmer’s verdict
Its nutritional balance, subtle flavour, and competitive price make it a good value for money option, provided you have the patience for a slightly longer rehydration time.
Pros
affordable
flavoursome
Cons
long rehydration time
watery
Quick specs
Price: £7.50 (available from Base Camp Food) Weight: 150g Calories: 600 Calories/100g: 398 Calories/£1: 80 Time to hydrate: 10 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? vegan adventurefood.com
I like this meal for its subtle spice level and cayenne pepper bringing a gentle heat. The texture of this vegan meal is generally pleasing, with a satisfying bite from the sweetcorn and black beans.
Doubling the hydration time to allow the sweet potato pieces to soften helped but the meal was excessively watery with the solid ingredients swimming in liquid like a chunky soup. In fact, it took almost 30 minutes for the liquid to be fully absorbed.
The additional ingredients of potato starch, glucose syrup, salt, modified starch (modified corn starch) didn’t add to the mouth feel or to thicken the sauce aka quinoa stock. While the bright packaging with ingredient images is eye-catching and the visual preparation instructions are clear, the information on the reverse side is printed in a small font.
Additionally, the fill line marker within the bag proved a bit challenging to locate initially – it’s quite small. Otherwise, the bag was easy to keep reopening and sealing. The nutritional profile, delivering 600 calories per serving, offers a good amount of protein and carbohydrates. It was an adequate portion size for me and my taste buds fired with each mouthful.
I even found the meal for £5.99 online, making it the lowest priced option in the review. Its nutritional balance, subtle flavour, and competitive price make it a good value for money option, provided you have the patience for a slightly longer rehydration time.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
The lightest meal tested, Gemma Palmer enjoyed this Firepot Hot Chocolate Pudding for times when a sweet treat on the go is on the menu.
Firepot delivers on its promise of decadent and real flavours, with dark chocolate and vanilla taking centre stage.
TGO Magazine verdict
If you’re seeking a decadent treat, this generous portion of pudding hits the spot and will undoubtedly boost morale at camp.
Pros
generous portion size
rich in flavour
Cons
high in sugar
Quick specs
Price: £7.49 (available from Ellis Brigham) Weight: 110g Calories: 500 Calories/100g: 450 Calories/£1: 67 Time to hydrate: 8 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? vegan firepotfood.com
This dehydrated pudding is thick and creamy with a chocolate aroma. Scanning the ingredients, just over 70 percent of this meal’s 500 calories come from carbohydrates and sugars. In my opinion, given this high percentage, it’s best suited as a top up of calories to a balanced meal. This vegan, gluten free, and lactose free option is suitable for those with dietary restrictions, with soya being the only allergen listed.
The vibrant packaging is durable and clear instructions and external fill lines simplify preparation. While the flavour and ease of preparation are excellent, the texture inconsistency and visual appeal stopped me giving it top marks. However, the durable packaging suggests the pudding would withstand warmer temperatures well.
If you’re seeking a decadent treat, this generous portion of pudding hits the spot and will undoubtedly boost morale at camp. Would I recommend it? Yes, as a calorific chocolatey reward.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
As a fan of this classic dish, I was keen to know if this freeze-dried LYO Expedition Menu Mac & Cheese version would deliver.
This delicious classic dish from LYO Expedition is reimagined for the outdoors and excels as both a standalone meal or a side.
Gemma Palmer recommends
I highly recommend this meal to anyone seeking a well-crafted and satisfying freeze dried option that prioritises flavour and clean eating.
Pros
bold flavour
creamy taste
Cons
occasional fine powdery texture
Quick specs
Price: £7.99 (available from Base Camp Food) Weight: 130g Calories: 625 Calories/100g: 481 Calories/£1: 78 Time to hydrate: 9 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? vegetarian lyofood.com
As a fan of a good Mac & Cheese, I was keen to know if this freeze-dried version would deliver, and thankfully, it did! This vegetarian meal is free from artificial additives and preservatives, making it a wholesome and natural choice.
The packaging is simple and minimal, with clear instructions that make preparation effortless. The internal fill line is hidden by the food, making it challenging to accurately measure the water and increasing the risk of spills.
The Mac & Cheese rehydrates to a creamy texture with a bold cheesy flavour and aroma. That’s the blend of pecorino, romano, and gruyère cheeses. However, I noticed a slight grainy texture in the sauce, possibly corn flour or shavings of cheese. Despite this minor issue, it provides a substantial 625 calories per serving, offering a significant energy boost.
This hot and satisfying meal truly captures the essence of a home cooked experience, making it an ideal choice for those craving a warm, comforting, and hearty meal without sacrificing quality or requiring lengthy preparation. I highly recommend this meal to anyone seeking a well-crafted and satisfying freeze dried option that prioritises flavour and clean eating.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
Gemma Palmer was pleasantly surprised by the absence of any strong cricket protein flavours in the Adventure Menu Cricket Protein Penne with ‘Creole’ Creamy Chicken.
This brand delivered with the Adventure Menu Cricket Protein Penne with ‘Creole’ Creamy Chicken vacuum-dried meal. It offers a sustainable, wholesome and satisfying 516 calories of high protein energy.
Gemma Palmer recommends
Overall, this dish is a delicious and innovative option for eco-conscious adventurers. The high protein source and the exceptional flavour make it a moorish camp meal.
Pros
high protein
quality ingredients
full of flavour
Cons
cricket protein might not appeal to everyone
Quick specs
Price: £10.19 (available from Base Camp Food) Weight: 160g Calories: 826 Calories/100g: 516 Calories/£1: 81 Time to hydrate: 8 – 10 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? no adventuremenu.com
It may only appeal to open minded, plant based or pro-eco eaters seeking a new protein source. This Czech based company is known for its innovative meals, and this cricket-based penne dish is no exception. It’s an intriguing real food taste experience.
A standout feature is the inclusion of SENS cricket protein powder, contributing 51g of protein to the meal. This was my first experience with cricket protein, and I was pleasantly surprised by the absence of any strong flavours in the penne. I’m impressed by the nutritional profile of vitamins and minerals. This product isn’t for people who have allergies to molluscs, crustaceans, and dust mites.
The ‘Creole’ sauce is a fusion of West African, French, and Spanish flavours. The aroma upon opening is mouthwatering with scents of garlic, onion, and herbs filling the air.
After adding water and waiting 13 minutes, the penne rehydrates well. The most noticeable ingredients on my first taste include chicken, cream, parmesan cheese, thyme, oregano, paprika sausage, and white pepper. The ‘Creole’ creamy chicken flavour is perfectly balanced. While the chicken pieces rehydrate well, adding a splash more water creates a more desirable, saucier consistency. The penne, though slightly denser than traditional pasta, offers a satisfying bite.
The brightly designed and robust packaging ensures the ingredients remain intact, and the internal large bold water fill line makes preparation a breeze. I’ve removed half a star as the occasional sausage piece didn’t rehydrate fully.
Overall, this dish is a delicious and innovative option for eco-conscious adventurers. The high protein source and the exceptional flavour make it a moorish camp meal.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
Ready in the time it takes to sort out a brew, this Expedition Foods breakfast is a great option for backpackers.
Fuelling for the day’s adventures shouldn’t be a chore. When it comes to breakfast I’m most interested in convenience and a delicious meal. Expedition Foods Breakfast Rolled Oats provides it with the mighty oat as the star performer for delivering a slow energy release.
Gemma Palmer recommends
Even Goldilocks would be happy to say this breakfast option is “just right”.
Pros
no wastage portion sizes
quick and easy to prepare
value for money
Cons
fruit didn’t rehydrate fully
Quick specs
Price: £8.49 (available from Base Camp Food) Weight: 114g Calories: 450 Calories/100g: 397 Calories/£1: 53 Time to hydrate: 5 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? vegan / vegetarian expeditionfoods.com
The 450-kcal pack provides a satisfying and sustaining meal to start the day. Rehydration is quick and easy, resulting in a creamy texture with a pleasant chew. The apple and blackcurrant flavour is balanced, and the inclusion of coconut milk powder adds a subtle richness.
It’s worth noting that rehydrating the fruit requires extra time in cold conditions or when using cold water. Perfect for vegans and clean eaters with its minimal ingredient list, this meal is dairy free, palm oil free, and contains no added preservatives or additives.
On a multi-day trip, I’d happily leave my usual nut butter addition at home to save on pack weight, as the added sugar contributes to the calories and provides a satisfying sweetness. Even Goldilocks would be happy to say it’s “just right.”
I’m pleased to see it comes in a range of portion sizes – 450, 800, and 1000 kcal packs to suit all energy needs and reducing food waste. The variety of pack sizes, combined with the delicious flavour and quick preparation, makes this an easy breakfast to quickly prepare in the time it takes to sort out a brew.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
A great winter warmer, the Real Turmat Asian Curry gets a Best in Test accolade.
Real Turmat Asian Curry’s accurate flavour descriptions, clear instructions, and consistently thorough rehydration place it in a class of its own.
Gemma Palmer’s Best in Test
While it may be slightly more expensive than some other rehydrated meals, the quality and taste justify the cost.
Pros
accurate description of flavours
spicy notes
Cons
sparse aubergine pieces
Quick specs
Price: £11.39 (available from Base Camp Food) Weight: 132g Calories: 537 Calories/100g: 112 Calories/£1: 47 Time to hydrate: 8 minutes Vegan/vegetarian/dairy free/gluten free? vegan Allergen: soya beans www.realoutdoorfood.shop
All that plus the taste, which is not far off a freshly prepared dish. The dish offers a satisfying blend of flavours and textures from the combination of the rice, aubergine, and pea protein chunks.
The packaging is recyclable with a striking orange and black style. The pack has been further made durable by vacuum packing the contents, which helped when playing tetris with gear in my backpack.
The external fill line was a real lifesaver. It made adding water incredibly easy and kept my hands cool, which was essential because the meal rehydrated incredibly quickly. I was surprised at how fast the ingredients started to plump up and come together.
The dish is very filling, thanks to the generous portion size and high-quality ingredients. The curry is entirely vegan, making it a suitable option for those with dietary restrictions. The only allergen is soya beans.
537 calories on the go. Credit: Gemma Palmer
With 537 calories per serving, this provides ample energy and the rice and pea protein went a long way in helping me feel full.
The curry is a balanced blend of spices, with a subtle hint of heat that complements the rice and vegetables. The aubergine pieces retained their shape and texture, adding to the sense of this being a real meal.
I highly recommend this option for anyone looking for a delicious and quick preparation meal. In my opinion it’s the best one for winter. While it may be slightly more expensive than some other rehydrated meals, the quality and taste justify the cost.
Testing Conditions
Gemma tested these meals during winter hikes on the chilly, windy Cambridgeshire river trails. She enjoys a hot meal stop in winter and favours plant-based options if available. This review was first published in the September 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
Lara Dunn rates the Lowe Alpine Airzone Active ND25 – one of the best budget hiking daypacks she has tested in the hills.
A female-suitable pack rather than female specific per se, the ND range from Lowe Alpine caters to users with narrower dimensions – the ND of the name – whatever their sex. The ND range includes packs across the size range from this 25-litre daypack – Lowe Alpine Airzone Active ND25 – through to 65 litre trekking packs.
Lara Dunn recommends
The AirZone Active ND25 is designed to be a fully featured but lightweight pack, well suited to warmer conditions thanks to its ventilated back system, hydration bladder compatibility and its twin mes
Pros
streamlined shape
comfortable fit
well-featured
Cons
narrower shape tends towards top heavy
Quick specs
RRP: $124.95 / £100 (available from Cotswold Outdoor) Weight: 925g (including raincover) Capacity: 25 litres Materials: Woven mini Ripstop (50% recycled) nylon with PFC-free DWR Back system: AirZone LT back system Pockets: interior and exterior zipped lid pocket, hip belt pockets, front zipped pocket, stretch mesh side pouch pockets Features: Trekking pole loops, hydration system compatible, removable rain cover, LED light loop, sternum strap with whistle Sizes: one (non-narrow dimensions available) Men’s version? unisex www.lowealpine.com
The AirZone Active ND25 is designed to be a fully featured but lightweight pack, well suited to warmer conditions thanks to its ventilated back system, hydration bladder compatibility and its twin mesh water bottle holders. The lightweight but well-padded harness system is easy to adjust and gives a highly comfortable fit.
Thanks to broad but pliable hip pads – with handy hip belt pockets – the fit is secure, stable and poses no risk of discomfort for women. The shoulder straps are shaped such that they curve around the bust nicely, too.
At 25 litres, this isn’t an overly generous pack and it’s very easy to fill up for a day hike, particularly one where variable weather is expected.
Thankfully, there are plenty of pockets inside and out, in which to keep extras tidied away so they’re easy to access. The side mesh pouch pockets easily take a water bottle each and are pretty secure, while the front zipped pocket is especially well-considered, easily taking a folded map with easy access.
With its narrow shape, some care to weight distribution is needed when packing, as it is easy to make the pack feel somewhat top heavy if fully laden. That said, it’s a stable pack and there’s no swinging about even when fully loaded.
The AirZone back system is subtly curved, meaning it sits nice and close to the back for good fit stability, while still allowing for excellent airflow, making it suitable for scrambles as well as hikes.
Testing conditions
Lara used the packs in winter and spring conditions on a variety of walks in the Malvern Hills, Brecon Beacons and Black Mountains. She is 5’5” tall with a relatively short back length in relation to her height. This review was first published in the June 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors.
The Rab Protium 27 – an otherwise excellent technical load carrier – has some compromising details.
The Rab Protium 27 is styled for more technical adventures, with a tapered bottom end for clearance when scrambling and a wider top which spreads the load across the shoulders.
Peter Macfarlane’s verdict
There are some frustrating and compromising details on an otherwise excellent load carrier.
Pros
stable
comfortable
good back system and harness
Cons
side pockets are inaccessible in use
heavy
Quick specs
RRP: $175 / £130 (available from Rab) Weight: 1065g Capacity: 27 litres Materials: 100D Robic Nylon Ripstop, 140D Nylon Back system: adjustable air contour back system, semi rigid ABS plastic back system Pockets: hip fins with zipped pockets, large external front and side mesh pockets, zipped access with external and internal pockets Features: rain cover, hydration compatible Sizes: regular and L/XL Women’s version? Protium ND25L rab.equipment
This shape works for running and mountain biking, although at over a kilo the Protium is a little heavy to be used for either. The excellent harness is height adjustable, and the padded and well-contoured shoulder straps easily slide up and down behind the stiffened back to Velcro into place at your chosen length. The stiff back helps to support a full load with stability and it has air gaps and mesh to promote moisture management.
The hip fins are the same mesh over foam design as the shoulder straps. They sit well on my frame and have good sized zipped pockets. The zipped main access is easy to use and there are pockets inside and outside at the zip which replicate handy lid pockets. On the front panel is a huge mesh stuff pocket with a securing buckle which I can even fit a small tent into.
There are attachment points for poles and axes and a small daisy chain which is great for a bike light or adding a bungee for expanding storage. The side panels let the Protium down. There are large mesh pockets perfect for bottles, sadly inaccessible when wearing the pack.
The pack is hydration compatible with a sleeve and hanging loop behind the back system but if you use bottles you have to take the pack off every time I want a drink. The pockets are also restricted by the compression straps, which can push bottles upwards on the move.
The construction necessary for the zipped raincover pocket in the base might be part of the reason the side pockets are set high. It’s a frustrating and compromising detail on an otherwise excellent load carrier.
Testing conditions
Reserve Ranger Peter rotated the packs on his regular 11km deer fence inspection walks in the Kilpatrick Hills and took them into the Munros through the winter. Peter is 1.8m in height and wears between regular and tall back lengths depending on design and brand.
This review was first published in the August 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors. Compare it with other daypacks in our guide to the best hiking backpacks.
With just two minor downsides, the Gregory Miko 30 is an easy Best in Test for Peter Macfarlane.
At first glance it might look like the trusted pack brand has followed a tried and tested format with the Gregory Miko 30, but after many months of use I’ve found that it’s the little things that make a difference.
Peter Macfarlane’s Best in Test
The layout, features, carry and little details like the huge faff free zip-pulls make the Miko an easy Best in Test for me and my current go-to day pack.
Pros
fit
comfort
usability
features
Cons
hip fin pockets could be a little bigger
Quick specs
RRP: $169.95 / £145 (available from SportsShoes.com) Weight: 994g Capacity: 30 litres Materials: Body: 100D High Density 30% Recycled Nylon & 210D High Density 45% Recycled Nylon. Base: 210D High Density 45% Recycled Nylon. Lining: 40% Post-consumer Recycled 135d Polyester. All with PFAS-free DWR. Bluesign approved buckles. Back system: adjustable length air mesh back Pockets: lid with pocket, internal and external zipped pockets, accessible side pockets, attachment points, padded hipbelt with pockets Features: single top access compartment, hydration compatible Sizes: regular and plus size Men’s version? Maya 30 eu.gregorypacks.com
The Miko has a single compartment with single buckle lid access. The opening is drawcorded and the lid placed and shaped to completely cover the opening for an excellent weather seal. The drawcord is a dual action type with a webbing loop to pull for easy opening. The lid has a decent sized zipped pocket and two webbing loops that I attached bungee loops to for carrying extra gear, especially my crampons on descent when I didn’t want melting snow inside the pack. Neatly hidden between lid and closure is the zipped access to the hydration sleeve.
Storage options are a strong feature, with a zipped mesh pocket just inside the closure incliding a keyclip. Outside on the front panel there is a bungee web which I used often for wet waterproofs, but it will take a lightweight tent. Under this is a large pocket with vertical zipped access on the right side. There’s a webbing loop at the bass which takes a bike light and by adding a bungee can expand carrying options still further. There are axe/pole attachments on the left side which were easy to use with gloves through last winter. I’d probably have liked to have these on both side of the pack, but the vertical zipped pocket that is the likely reason for the omission is a compromise I’ve been happy with.
The side panels have an excellent layout with large 3D shaped mesh pockets that will take a 1 litre bottle and are accessible while walking. The side compression straps sit above the pocket and are angled away from a hand reaching back so they don’t interfere with the usability and are effective at cinching in the pack.
Peter testing the Miko 30. Credit: Peter Macfarlane
The back system is adjustable for length via a Velcro panel which forms part of the shoulder strap assembly. It’s easy to adjust and very secure. I have it set at its maximum length and it’s a perfect fit on my frame. The back system feels quite stiff in the hand but the whole pack can be rolled up so there is a lot of flexibility in there. This mix ensures stability and comfort as well as protection from shoddy packing with no sharp corners pushing into my back.
The rear panel includes a meshed ridge design – so there is a some attempt at moisture management – but the closer fit adds comfort and stability. I haven’t felt any downside to the simpler back.
The wide and nicely padded hipbelt is ergonomically grown from the back system giving a wraparound feel which I appreciated on winter early starts with a heavy load. The hipfins also have handy zipped pockets. The shoulder straps are low profile and flexible with a good amount of padding to be comfortable with the fewer layers I was wearing into Spring. Adjustment is easy and the sternum strap does its job.
The lid buckle could do with allowing better adjustment when the pack is only part loaded, the hip fin pockets could be a little bigger volume but otherwise, the layout, features, carry and little details like the huge faff free zip-pulls make the Miko an easy Best in Test for me and my current go-to day pack.
Testing conditions
Reserve Ranger Peter rotated the packs on his regular 11km deer fence inspection walks in the Kilpatrick Hills and took them into the Munros through the winter. Peter is 1.8m in height and wears between regular and tall back lengths depending on design and brand.
This review was first published in the August 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors. Compare it with other daypacks in our guide to the best hiking backpacks.
Given the sheer number of features the Osprey Tempest 33 offers, it’s surprisingly lightweight, yet still tough enough to cope with a good battering in the hills.
A female-specific pack aimed at fast and light overnighters or demanding days out in the hills, the Osprey Tempest 33 is an all-singing, all-dancing fully-featured daysack that demonstrates close attention to detail in its design.
Lara Dunn’s Best in Test
This pack demonstrates great value for money for an extremely technical and competent, versatile daypack.
Pros
lightweight
fully featured
comfortable
stable
sustainability credentials
Cons
no raincover
Quick specs
RRP: $190 / £155 (available from Cotswold Outdoor) Weight: 1192g Capacity: 33 litres Materials: 100% recycled 100D high-tenacity nylon with dobby check ripstop, 100% recycled 420D nylon base Back system: adjustable Airscape back system Pockets: Stretch mesh side and front pockets, zipped hipbelt pockets, ice axe and trekking pole attachments, Features: dual compression straps, , internal hydration sleeve, sternum strap with whistle Sizes: one Men’s version? Talon 33 osprey.com
One area in which this pack truly excels is fit. Finding a genuine female-specific pack at this size is unusual, with most packs using a unisex chassis in the smaller volumes, reserving gender specific tweaks for larger trekking packs. Even more unusual though, is finding one where the fit can be fine-tuned further still. The harness has a sliding adjustment to accommodate different torso proportions and straps are arranged to tweak the fit to suit at shoulders and hips. The result is comfortable for long days and extremely stable.
The pads at the hips, while low profile, move subtly with the pelvis in use, making the pack feel like an extension of the body, even when fully laden. It’s spot on for more technical walks or scrambles, staying put even when the wearer’s torso and hips are moving about more than usual.
Size wise, this 33 litre pack is large enough to accommodate kit for a long winter mountain day, a lightweight overnighter (or two) or even a trip to the shops. It easily swallows jackets, spare layers and supplies, is just about long enough for a compact tent (straps easily onto the outside if not) and yet still feels nimble and comfortable in wear. It can be cinched in easily when not full, making it flexible for a variety of load carrying, not just the big days.
Lara testing the Osprey Tempest. Credit: Lara Dunn
Given the sheer number of features it offers, it’s surprisingly lightweight, yet still tough enough to cope with a good battering in the hills. The pack has ice axe/trekking pole attachment loops, which are straightforward to use. There are zipped and mesh pockets in the lid as well as side mesh bottle pockets and an internal sleeve for a hydration system. The zipped hip belt pockets are generously sized, albeit a little stiff to operate easily while wearing the pack. A massive mesh stash pocket at the front is spot on for stowing a wet waterproof in changeable conditions.
The rugged fabric is made from 100D 100% recycled nylon with a PFAS-free water repellent treatment, and a tougher and more durable 420D base, again made from recycled nylon. The whole pack is bluesign approved (meaning its materials and components meet certain criteria for environmental and social responsibility), which along with its overall durability makes it a reliable environmentally conscious choice.
Not only is this a pack that’s built with an eye to the environment, but it should also last for a good number of years, making for less waste and landfill. It’s quite surprising that such a well-designed and well-made pack comes in at a pretty reasonable price. It demonstrates great value for money for an extremely technical and competent, versatile daypack.
Testing conditions
Lara used the packs through winter and spring on a variety of walks and hikes in the Malvern Hills, Black Mountains and Brecon Beacons. She is 5’5” tall with a relatively short back length in relation to her height.
This review was first published in the August 2025 issue of The Great Outdoors. Compare it with other daypacks in our guide to the best hiking backpacks.
Choosing a camping stove can be difficult as there are many good ones available. None of those reviewed could be described as poor. How then do you decide which stove is best for you? That depends on several factors. How many people will it be used for? A stove for several people needs to support big pots. A stove for solo use can be minimalist and ultralight. When will the stove be used? All stoves work fine in warm weather. Not all work well in the cold. Which fuel is best? For short trips where it will all be carried from home this doesn’t matter. For longer trips you need to know what fuel will be available along the way. Fuel efficiency matters as well – the better it is the less often you’ll need to resupply. Do you just want a stove to boil water or one that simmers so you can do some real cooking? Not all stoves have easily controlled flames.
With any stove you need a pot or two. Some models come with pots, and they’re often designed to work together as a system. If you don’t already have any pots one of these could be a good choice.
An MSR stove is a TGO Challenger’s companion. Credit: Ali Ogden
Fast boil times sound impressive. However running a stove at full power isn’t best for fuel efficiency. Turning the stove down a little and waiting a minute or two for your tea or coffee saves fuel. Other simple ways to reduce fuel use are to have a lid on the pot and to use a windscreen. Heat exchanger pots also make a big difference.
Whichever stove you choose it’s always best to practise with it at home rather than trying to work out how to light it on a windy hillside. Stoves are potentially dangerous so knowing how to operate one safely is essential.
What camping stove you choose depends on where you plan to go with it, in what conditions, and how you use your hot water. That and your budget – there’s a wide range of prices here too. Looking for advice for maintaining a stove? Our guide on how clean a camping stove will help you there.
Why you can trust The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors is here to help you make the most of your time outside. We have been helping people to explore from sea to summit, valley to mountain top for over 40 years. Our gear tests remain completely impartial. If you are wary of websites that only review brands that advertise with them, or sceptical of social media accounts always singing the praises of their latest freebie, you’ve come to the right place! Our reviews rank #1 for rigour, trustworthiness, and independence, and our gear testing team is the most experienced in Britain. With over 200 years’ experience between us, we are professional mountain leaders and instructors, wildlife photographers and rangers, outdoor authors, guidebook writers and trail addicts.
The best camping stoves we’ve tested
Quick List
Gear of the Year Award Winner: Optimus Vega (available from Base Camp Food)
Best all-season efficiency: SOTO Fusion Trek (available from Ellis Brigham)
The Optimus Vega is a remote canister stove suitable for year-round use. It has a preheat tube running over the burner that vaporises the gas, which means it can be used as a liquid fuel stove in subzero temperatures by inverting the canister. Unusually, it has flip-out wire legs to hold the inverted canister in place and enable the control lever to still be used. Optimus says that used like this it’ll work down to -20°C.
The Vega is compact when packed as the pot support/legs fold around the burner. At 178g it’s light for a remote canister stove. It has a low profile so stability is good and the pot supports are quite wide, making it fine for use with big pots. The burner is powerful and it boils water fast and works well for melting snow. Flame control is good for simmering. It’s fuel efficient too, though fuel usage increases when the canister is inverted so this should only be done when necessary. The Vega comes with a foil disc to place under it to prevent it scorching the ground, but not a windscreen, which is needed in strong winds. One is available separately, the Optimus Wind Foil, which weighs 36g and costs £7.70. The Vega itself costs £139.99. Tester Peter Macfarlane says “the Vega is excellent – a reliable go-to and brilliant in the tent porch.”
It’s super-stable and all-season-capable, and is built to last. It can simmer, not just nuke, water; it can cook for one or for five; and it’s economical to run.
Pros
all-season remote canister design
fuel efficiency
price
Cons
slightly bulkier than other options
pan and windshield not included
Quick specs
Price: $84.95 / £65 Weight: 186g Type: Pressure-regulated remote-canister stove Fuel: Gas Dimensions: 11x6x10cm Burner diameter: 6cm Power: 3260W / 11000BTU Boil Time Average: 4min on test Burn Time Approx: 90min from a 230g canister (quoted) sotooutdoors.com
In brief and for those who don’t know the brand, The SOTO Fusion Trek camping stove is a remote-canister version of the well regarded Windmaster stove. There’s a fairly wide burner, with around 300 burn holes sitting in a concave circular ‘tray’ and surrounded by a lip of metal. The three legs extend very securely, and the pot supports are integral to the legs, making for a very stable base. The hose to the canister is very flexible, which may sound trivial, but if you’ve ever wrestled a stiff fuel hose and a windshield together in the cold, you’ll realise how useful this is. Even the canister attachment is well-designed and has a wired hoop control for fine flame control at the canister end.
The Fusion Trek gets my Best Buy because of its versatility. It’s super-stable and all-season-capable, and is built to last. It can simmer, not just nuke, water; it can cook for one or for five; and it’s economical to run.
The Windmaster is a close to perfect backpacking stove (I would like to see permanently attached pot supports) suitable for year-round use.
Pros
Fast boil time
Good flame control
Stable with big pots
Lighweight
Cost
Cons
Detachable pot supports
Not full windproof
Quick specs
Price: $69.95 / £65 Weight: 88g Accessories: piezo igniter Fuel: butane/propane canister Packed Dimensions: 9.2 x 8.5 cm (with supports folded in place) Burner Diameter: 4cm Burner weight: 61g without supports Power: 3260w/11000 BTU Boil time: std pot 2 min 48 sec. HX pot 1min 25sec. Fuel used: std pot 10g. HX pot 6g. sotooutdoors.com
The Soto Windmaster 4Flex camping stove is lightweight, fast-boiling, and well-suited for year-round use. It features four pot supports for stability and is wide enough to support large pots. The stove’s wind resistance is achieved through a raised rim around the burner and the closeness of the pot to the flame. However, a windscreen is recommended in strong winds.
In tests, the Soto Windmaster 4Flex had the fastest boil times and excellent flame control. Fuel efficiency is comparable to the heavier Primus PrimeTech stove. The stove has a regulated burner, ensuring minimal performance drop even on frosty mornings. It is suitable for winter use, especially with an HX pot.
The stove also has a built-in piezo igniter, which is better protected than other stoves and has not failed. The Windmaster is a close-to-perfect backpacking stove, but it would benefit from permanently attached pot supports for year-round use.
There’s a lot to like here. It’s a simple, very light design that packs small and will allow basic cooking.
Pros
Weight
Compact size
Reasonable Simmer control
Cons
No wind resistance without a windshield (not inlcluded)
No pressure regulator
Quick specs
Price: $127.95 | £155 (available now from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 232g including burner, pot and canister stand (24g) Type: Unregulated pressure canister-top stove system with integrated pan and heat exchanger Fuel: Gas Dimensions: Pot 0.8 Litres, 10x12cm Burner diameter: 4cm Power: 1318W/ 4500BTU Boil time: Average 5min on test Burn time: Approx 80min from a 230g canister (quoted)
The Jetboil Stash camping stove was big news when unveiled a year or two ago as the lightest in the range. It achieved the 200g-ish all-in weight by dumping some of the features found on larger and heavier models. The Stash too is a ‘stove system’, but it’s really packable. The 0.8 litre pot is wide rather than tall, making it less prone to burning food and easier to stir the contents. It’s more than big enough for most solo meals (and will hold a 100g canister if you wish). There’s a very solid integrated handle that folds over the plastic lid, which has a built-in drainer.
There’s a lot to like here. It’s a simple, very light design that packs small and will allow basic cooking. For longer, warmer-weather trips nothing else is needed.
Read more: David Lintern’s full review of the Jetboil Stash
Primus PrimeTech Stove Set 1.3L
Chris recommends
The PrimeTech Camping Stove Set is an excellent choice for group cooking. It’s designed for 1-3 people but is rather big and heavy for solo use.
Pros
Windscreen
Heat exchanger pot
Stable
Fast boil
Good flame control
Quiet burner
Cons
Ceramic pot easily scratched
Quite heavy
Quick specs
Price: £165 Weight: 875g Accessories: windscreen, 1.3 litre pot with heat exchanger, 1.3 litre pot, pot gripper, piezo Igniter, insulated storage bag Fuel: butane/propane canister Packed Dimensions: 19 x 13.5cm Burner Diameter: 4cm Burner weight: 336g Power: 2000w, 7000 BTU Boil time: std pot 3min 5sec. HX pot 2min 10sec Fuel used: std pot 10g. HX pot 6g. https://primusequipment.co.uk
The PrimeTech Camping Stove Set is a versatile and efficient cooking tool designed for 1-3 people. It is large and heavy for solo use but can also be used with larger pots. The burner is integrated into the windscreen and pot supports, providing stability and a low profile. Primus provides a foil heat reflector to prevent scorching the earth.
The stove also features a preheat tube for better performance in freezing conditions. The burner is quiet, unlike most canister stoves. The set includes two pots, a 65g detachable lockable pot grip, a separate 40g Piezo igniter, and a 60g insulated storage bag that doubles as a pot cosy. One pot has a heat exchanger and a non-stick ceramic coating, making it more fuel-efficient.
The ceramic coating prevents food sticking but is easily scratched. The stove is easy to assemble and use, but assembling the set can be challenging. The storage bag keeps everything in place, making it a convenient choice for group cooking.
I like the Alpkit Koro enough to own one; I bought and paid for the unit on test. It’s simple, light, packs down small and is inexpensive.
Pros
inverted canister all-season use
suits variety of pots
price
Cons
marginally less efficient than other comparable stoves on test
pan and windshield not included
Quick specs
Price: £41 Weight: 126g Type: Pressure-regulated remote-canister stove with preheat tube Fuel: Gas Dimensions: 8x8x9cm Burner diameter: 8cm Power: 2800W / 9553BTU Boil time Average: 5min on test Burn time Approx: 70min from a 230g canister (quoted) www.alpkit.com
The Alpkit Koro has three legs and three pot supports. The Koro is pretty powerful, but there are faster units out there. The burner has no inherent wind resistance other than it being close to the ground, and so a half-height windshield is essential. Similarly, simmer control is OK, but not world-beating. The ability to invert the canister in colder temperatures or when near the end of the canister is really useful.
I like the Alpkit Koro enough to own one; I bought and paid for the unit on test, last year. It’s simple, light, packs down small and is inexpensive. There are other options here that will boil faster using less gas, and I’d prefer the pot supports to be a little more robust; but the Koro operates on a principle of good enough – and most of the time it’s just that.
Overall, the Switch is an efficient system with an interesting and unusual pot. It’s not the lightest option but the price is reasonable.
Pros
Regulated burner
Fast boil time
Pot design
Cons
Tall & narrow pot
Not that light
Quick Specs
Price: $139.95 / £135 (available from Cascade Designs) Weight: 389g complete, burner & pot w/out accessories 328g Fuel: isobutane/propane Dimensions: stove 9.4 x 8.4cms, pot 17.7 x 11cms Burner Diameter: 2.8cms Power: 7100 BTU, 2100W Boil time: 2 minutes 45 seconds Fuel Used: 10 grams www.msrgear.com
The latest combined stove and pot system from MSR – the MSR Switch Stove System – has a unique design unlike anything I’ve seen before. It’s very different to MSR’s other stove systems, the well-established Reactor and Windburner, which have radiant burners and can only be used with compatible heat exchanger MSR pots. The lighter weight Switch has a standard burner and is more versatile as it can be used with any pots. The cost is also much lower.
Trangias are long-lasting – mine is over 40 years old and still works fine. If weight isn’t a major factor it’s an excellent choice. I wouldn’t choose one for lightweight backpacking though.
Pros
Windproof
Stable
Durable
Good pots
Low cost
Cons
Heavy
Bulky
Quick specs
Price: £73.20 Weight: 825g Accessories: windscreen/pot support, 2 1 litre aluminium pans, 0.6 litre kettle, frypan/plate/lid, pot grab, simmer ring Fuel: methylated spirits/denatured alcohol/gel fuel Packed Dimensions: 19 x 10cm Burner Diameter: 5cm Burner weight: 70g Power: 1000w Boil time: std pot 8min 20sec. HX pot 7min 30sec. Fuel used: std pot 25ml. HX pot 20ml. https://trangia.se
The Trangia is the original camping stove system, launched in the 1950s. It features a rigid two-part aluminum windshield that protects the brass burner in strong winds. The stove comes with a simmer ring, a metal circle that covers flame holes with a movable lid that can be adjusted to block part of the open well. This device works well but is crude.
The Trangia 27-1 is the smallest and lightest of the complete Trangia stove sets, suitable for 1-2 people. It comes with two 1 litre aluminium pots and a kettle. Heavier versions are available with non-stick and hard anodised aluminium pots. The Trangia 27-2 is suitable for 1-2 people but has slow boil times compared to canister stoves.
Trangias are long-lasting, with a 40-year-old model still functioning fine. They are an excellent choice for weight-conscious travelers, but not for lightweight backpacking. The Trangia is long-lasting and works well for 1-2 people, but not for lightweight backpacking.
The Windburner shines as a winter stove and in very windy conditions but is quite heavy for summer use.
Pros
Wind resistance
Fast boil time
Good fuel efficiency
Simmers well
Cons
Quite heavy
Narrow pot
Can’t use other pots
Expensive
Quick specs
Price: $199.95 / £200 (available from Cotswold Outdoor and Cascade Designs) Weight: 425g Accessories: 1 litre pot with heat exchanger & insulated pot cozy, 0.5 litre bowl, canister support Fuel: butane/propane canister Packed Dimensions: 18 x 11.5 cm Burner Diameter: 7cm Burner weight: 198g Power: 2050ww/7000 BTU Boil time: 2min 36sec Fuel used: 8g https://www.msrgear.com
The MSR Windburner is a heat exchanger camping stove with a regulated burner that is ideal for melting snow and freezing temperatures. It is designed for one person and can hold 1 liter of water, but it is best used with a smaller amount to avoid boiling over. The flame control is good for simmering food, but it is easy to turn off due to the lack of visibility.
The regulated burner glows red and is surrounded by a windshield, which locks the pot securely. The unit is tall and narrow, making it difficult to topple over. Boil time is fast and fuel efficiency is good. The stove has a cozy round pot and a semi-rigid fabric handle for a good grip.
The lid is transparent and has strainer and drinking holes, but it warps after use. The pot is tall and narrow, ideal for boiling water but not for cooking. Due to its proprietary fit, it can only be used with larger MSR pots. The MSR Windburner is suitable for winter and windy conditions but heavy for summer use.
For solo backpackers this is the best complete stove system I’ve tried though it is more expensive and heavier than putting together your own stove and HX pot combination
Pros
Regulated Burner
HX pot
Fast boil
Good simmer control
Cons
Not fully windproof
Expensive
Quick specs
Price: £175 Weight: 349g Accessories: 0.8 litre pot with heat exchanger & insulated pot cozy, 0.3 litre bowl, pot support for other pots, piezo igniter, canister stand Fuel: butane/propane canister Packed Dimensions: 15.5 x 11.5cm Burner Diameter: 3.5cm Burner weight: 132g Power: 1750w/6000 BTU Boil time: std pot 4 min 10sec. HX pot 2min 14sec Fuel used: std pot 11g. HX pot 6g. https://www.jetboil.co.uk
The Jetboil MicroMo camping stove is a lightweight and compact cooking system designed for solo use. It features a heat exchanger pot locked onto a regulated burner, resulting in a fast boil time with the supplied pot.
The stove’s hard anodized pot is tall and narrow, with a secure grip and a twist-lock mechanism. The stove can topple over unless on a level surface, and a 26g canister stand helps prevent it from falling off. A separate pot support is also provided, allowing for the use of other pots. A shallow plastic cover for the base adds 33g.
The Jetboil MicroMo is excellent for cooking, but it may not be fully windproof, so a foil windscreen is recommended. For solo backpackers, this is the best complete stove system, though it is more expensive and heavier than assembling your own stove and HX pot combination.
Overall the Crux Lite is best kept for three season use for which it is excellent.
Pros
Powerful
Lightweight
Low cost
Cons
Not wind resistant
Not suitable for big pots
Quick specs
Price: £45 Weight: 75g Accessories: none Fuel: butane/propane canister Packed Dimensions: 7.1 x 5.6 Burner Diameter: 4.7cms Weight: 75g Power: 3000w/1200 BTU Boil time: std pot 3 min 15sec. HX pot 1min 50sec. Fuel used: std pot 10g. HX pot 8g. https://www.katadyngroup.com
The Optimus Crux Lite is a compact, lightweight canister top camping stove that is easy to set up and light. It features three serrated pot support arms that fold over the burner, and a large wire flame control that folds inwards. The stove is best used with small pots for stability, as the pot supports are not very wide. Wider pot supports are recommended for better stability. The stove lacks wind resistance, so a windshield is needed. A foil one-round three-sided stove works well for ventilation and temperature control.
In above freezing temperatures, the Optimus Crux Lite performs well, boiling water quickly and simmering well, using less gas than heat exchanger stoves. However, its burner is not regulated, making performance less efficient in cold weather. Boiling 500ml of water at -2°C took eight and a half minutes, using 14 grams of fuel. Warming the cartridge and insulating it from the ground can help, but the Crux Lite is best kept for three-season use, where it is excellent.
The Tupike is a two burner camping stove desgined for basecamps and backpacking, it is large and heavy but beautifully finished and is a bit of a gas guzzler.
Pros
Genuine simmer-capable cooking stove
Made to last
Cons
Thirsty on fuel
Quick specs
Price: $260 | £240 (Buy now from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 4.3kg Type: Pressure-regulated dual burner base camp stove Fuel: Gas Dimensions: 8x48x30cm Burner diameter: 4.6cm Power: 3000W /1023BTU Boil time: average 5min on test Burn time: approx 47min from a 230g canister (quoted)
The Tupike is a two-burner camping stove designed for basecamps and backpacking. It has two independent burners, two piezo igniters and two flame controls, and a griddle. It is large and heavy, but is also beautifully finished in brass, oak and brushed aluminium. It sits on two locking and folding legs and has adjustable windshields and a splashback. However, its fuel efficiency is a bit of a gas guzzler, so it should be used with larger canisters and boil/rest cycles to conserve fuel.
It is a one-trick pony and expensive, but it is perfect for short, sharp missions to the mountains, especially in winter.
Pros
Rapid boil
Excellent wind resistance
Compact
Cons
No simmer capability
Quick specs
Price: $270 | £295 (Buy now from alpinetrek.co.uk) Weight: 432g Type: pressure-regulated, radiant burner stove system with integrated pan and heat exchanger Fuel: gas Dimensions: 12×14.5cm Burner diameter: 10cm Power: 9000W / 3070BTU Burn time: approx 80min from a 230g canister (quoted)
The Reactor is a high-performance camping stove designed to melt snow and boil water quickly. It is wind-resistant and uses both convective heat and radiant light energy. It has a solid, all-metal handle that stays cool to the touch and folds away securely over a pot lid with a strainer and steam release. The pressure regulator gives an even burn and it was the only stove on test to beat its quoted boil times. It is a one-trick pony and expensive, but it is perfect for short, sharp missions to the mountains, especially in winter.
Whilst boil times are much slower than a canister stove the advantages of the Bruler are that meths/ denatured alcohol is found in far more places than canisters and that it’s silent.
Pros
Durable
Low cost
Cons
Needs windshield
Quick specs
Price: £30 Weight: 165g Accessories: windscreen, flame regulator Fuel: methylated spirits/denatured alcohol/gel fuel Packed Dimensions: 8 x9 cm Burner Diameter: 5cm Burner weight: 70g Power: n/a Boil time: std pot 9min 23sec, HX pot 7min 50 sec Fuel used: std pot 25ml. HX pot 20ml. https://alpkit.com
The Alpkit Bruler is a compact meths camping stove with a brass burner and an anodised aluminium windshield. It has fold-out legs and pot supports, and is stable with large pots, but small narrow ones may not balance well. The stove works well in breezes but requires a separate windshield for strong winds. The power output is almost identical to the Trangia, but a separate windshield is needed for strong winds.
The Bruler is suitable for solo use, as it weighs 429 grams with a foil windscreen and a 1 liter HX pot. Boil times are slower than canister stoves, but it is more accessible and silent. It allows for brewing up and listening to bird songs. While not ideal for quick brews, it is suitable for those not in a hurry. The Bruler is a good choice for those who don’t want the bulk and weight of the Trangia stove.
The Fire Beetle is made from stainless steel and should last well. That does make it quite heavy though. The cost is low and it is good value for money.
Remote canister camping stoves are ideal for big pots due to their stability and wide legs. The Robens Fire Beetle is a popular choice for those who are nervous about the burner and pot sitting on top of the canister. It features three fold-out legs and a flame control lever on the canister. However, it lacks a foil windscreen and a preheat tube, making it a three-season stove.
The burner is not regulated, making it less effective in cold or empty canisters. A windshield is essential for better performance. The Fire Beetle is made from stainless steel and should last well, but it is quite heavy.
Despite its weight, the Robens Fire Beetle is a good value for money, with a low cost and good value for money. The stove works well with both standard and HX pots, boiling water quickly and simmering well.
MSR have a reputation for making camping stoves with versatility and performance, and this is no exception.
Pros
Pressure regulator
Efficiency
Boil time
Simmer control
Build Quality
Cons
Nothing
Quick specs
Price: $85 | £70 Weight: 82g + 17g case Dimensions: 180mm/ 65mm Burner Diameter: 47mm Power: 10,400/ 3200 W Boil time: 1min 35 secs Gas used: 9g
MSR have a reputation for making camping stoves with versatility and performance, and this is no exception. The Pocket Rocket Deluxe is lightweight and compact, has a very fast boil time yet is efficient and easy to control with a lower flame. The built-in Piezo is positive, firing with a single click, and close to the canister so distant from the flame. The pressure regulator works extremely well, even with low gas levels and in cold conditions and the combination of price, weight, performance and MSR attention to detail on every aspect of the design and function makes this a top choice.
In this guide you will find reviews from Chris Townsend and David Lintern. Most were originally published in the August 2024 issue of The Great Outdoors but we have also updated this gear guide with the latest tests as new innovations come onto the market.
Chris’ testing notes
The stoves were used on year-round trips in the Scottish Highlands in different conditions, mostly in 2023 and 2024, though in one case going all the way back to 1978!
In controlled conditions in still air I boiled 500ml of water in each stove with a standard pot and a heat exchanger pot (except for the MSR Windburner as this can’t be used with a different pot). Boiling times indicate the power of the stove. In cold weather, especially when melting snow, this can be important. I also measured how much fuel was used, which I think is more significant than boiling time, especially on multi-day walks. The results show that HX pots are more fuel efficient and reduce boil times with all stoves.
Go System 2250 canisters were used with the gas stoves, Bartoline methylated spirits with the Trangia and Alpkit Bruler stoves. For stoves that don’t come with pots I used 1 litre hard anodised aluminium pots – the GSI Pinnacle Soloist and Fire Maple FMC-XK6 HX.
In field use several variables – air temperature, water temperature, wind speed and more – will produce different results so these figures are comparative only.
The MSR Switch in use at camp. Credit: Chris Townsend
David’s testing notes
David tested his stoves on walks and backpacks from glen level to Munro summits across the eastern and western Highlands in 2024. It was winter on the tops and spring in the glens. He tends to boil water for dehydrated meals, but his budget is supermarket rather than branded outdoor sachets. As such, his food needs longer to hydrate and he does a little more in-pot preparation, rather than just pour-and-wait. This makes a difference to what he looks for in a stove.
Measuring stove performance is as hard as or harder than evaluating sleeping bags as there are so many variables – “but at least I was able to drink lots of tea as I tested,” he said. When deciding on a purchase, it’s worth looking closely at the power output and burn times in conjunction with David’s boil times, which he averaged over multiple uses in different conditions. There is no industry standard, and quoted figures need to be read with care and balanced with the comments in review.
Testing the MRS Reaktor in Glen Feshie. Credit: David Lintern
What to look for in camping stoves
Fuel
Butane/propane in canisters is hot, convenient, and clean. Stoves generally have good flame control. Methylated spirits/denatured alcohol/gel fuel doesn’t give out as much heat and flame control is poor. However only the amount needed needs to be carried and it isn’t a petroleum product. Meths stoves are silent too.
Burner Head
Small diameter burner heads are best used with narrow pots. Wider burner heads spread the flame more efficiently and work well with larger pans.
Stability
Stability can be an issue with canister stoves. The simplest – a gas head that screws onto a canister – need a very stable base to counteract the effect of perching a loaded pan on top of a stove, on top of a canister. By contrast, a remote canister stove sits on the ground with its own legs and is attached to the canister by a flexible fuel hose. It has the additional advantage of allowing the canister to be inverted in cold weather or when nearly empty.
Rich Hartfield cooking in camp in the Cairngorms. Credit: David Lintern
Burner diameter
Gas stoves with small-diameter burner heads can create intense burn zones, or hot spots, on cooking pans. Others are wide but work less well with taller, thinner pots. Some stoves come as complete ‘systems’, with exchangers built into the accompanying pan to distribute heat more evenly. Pan materials also matter: thin titanium is prone to hot spots; stainless steel is better; a thick aluminium pan is best at dispersing heat.
Efficiency
Fuel efficiency is a trade-off between weight, speed, size, design and the conditions of use. It’s impacted by ambient temperature, altitude and wind, and is difficult to measure accurately. A heat exchanger pot or a pressure regulator can improve fuel efficiencies. In Britain the most common type of gas canister cartridge is screw-on, and most contain a mix of butane, isobutane and propane. Isobutane has better vapour pressure and offers superior performance, especially in low temperatures. Butane is the cheapest but poorest-performing fuel in the mix.
Gas
Brands will specify their stoves should only be used with their own brand gas canisters. In reality they will work with any canister with a compatible connection (in Britain, the most common type is the screw-on). Virtually all compact cartridges contain a mix of butane, isobutane and propane. Isobutane is far superior in terms of vapour pressure, and high vapour pressure translates to better performance, especially in low temperatures. Isobutane is more expensive to source than butane, so you’ll usually find it in higher-quality canisters. Normal butane is the cheapest and poorest-performing fuel in the mix. Burning efficiency is also reduced by cold temperatures, high altitude and wind.
Windshield
A windshield is needed with every stove in any wind stronger than a light breeze. Some stoves come with windshields as part of the design. Fully encircling foil windshields can be used with remote canister stoves. Canister top stoves shouldn’t be fully surrounded by a windshield as the cartridge needs to be kept cool.
Pans
Camping stoves with small diameter burner heads can create intense burn zones, or hot spots, on cooking pans. Titanium pans have thin bases so are prone to this, stainless steel is better, a thick aluminium pan is best at dispersing heat.
Controls
Stoves may have compact gas control dials, or wire hoops that fold out, which can provide finer control of the flame and reduce the risk of burning fingers or sleeves. Onboard piezo igniters are a nice convenience, but it’s worth carrying a fire steel and/or a lighter in case of failure. Multifuel stoves come with a pump system to fit pressurised fuel bottles.
Many people talk about the ‘Big Three’ when it comes to hiking and camping: that’s your backpack, your backpacking tent and your sleeping bag. For backpacking, we think it’s better to think about a ‘Big Four’ with that extra digit accounting for your cooking system.
An example of a multi-fuel stove. Credit: Primus
Heat Exchanger
Sets of radiator-like fins attached to the base of a pot are designed to reduce heat loss and increase fuel efficiency and boil times. These are provided with some stoves as part of a component system. Heat exchanger (HX) pots can be bought separately.
Regulated and non-regulated canister stoves
Canisters lose pressure as the gas is released. This happens more rapidly in cold weather. Below zero power output can double the time it takes water to boil. If the canister is less than half full water may not boil at all. Keeping the canister warm helps – in your sleeping bag overnight, putting your hands round it for example. A better solution is a stove with a regulated burner that controls the pressure for a more consistent performance. Regulated burners perform better with an almost empty canister though there’s still some drop off in power.
Pre-heat Tubes
A pre-heat tube is a loop of the fuel line that runs over the burner so it is heated by the flame. They are found on some remote cartridge stoves. A preheat tube means the cartridge can be inverted in cold weather to turn it into a liquid feed stove – the liquid turns to gas when heated in the pre-heat tube. Such stoves are excellent in sub-zero temperatures.
Pot Supports
The width and strength of the pot supports determines how heavy a pot they can safely support.
Piezo Ignition
Many stoves have Piezo ignition. This is fine – when it works. Such ignition can easily be damaged so carrying a back-up is a good idea.
Mary Ann Ochota tries out technical legwear – the Alpine Parrot Ponderosa trousers – specifically designed for plus sizes.
Size 16 is now the UK average dress size, but the majority of technical outdoor clothing stops at a 16. Less-technical pieces in a range sometimes go up to size 18 or 20, but they might not meet your needs for a serious mountain day, and are often ‘sized up’ from smaller sizes, meaning that the proportions are out of whack, and don’t actually fit anyone well. The Alpine Parrot Ponderosa trousers are part of the answer to this issue.
Mary-Ann Ochota highly recommends
The trousers are high rise and sit smoothly under a rucksack waistband. The fabric is lightweight but doesn’t feel flimsy but is soft and breathable.
Pros
fit
performance
fun colourways
Cons
cost
only available in one inside leg measurement (32”)
Quick Specs
Price: $139 / £125 (available from Vampire Outdoors) Weight: 360g Materials: Nylon/Elastane mix: Quick drying, breathable, 2-way stretch, UPF 40 protection. Integrated webbing belt. Bluesign certified fabric and dyes. Features: A curved, high-rise waist and built-in belt, key ring loop, button and loop to roll hem up to capri mid-calf, three colours. Pockets: 2 front pockets, 1 thigh pocket with zip, 2 back pockets. Hem: sewn Sizes: UK Women’s 16/18 – 32 (US 14-30) in two curve ratios – Mountain Fit (wider hips) and River Fit (slimmer hips) Mens version: no alpineparrot.com
“When clothes don’t fit, it’s not our bodies’ fault – it’s the clothing, “ says brand founder Raquel Vélez, who is plus size and whose background is in engineering. They come in two fits – Mountain and River – to accommodate the different ways people carry weight. At each waist size, the Mountain Fit is cut for a narrower waist and a fuller, curvier bottom and hips. The River Fit is for people who have similar measurements at waist and hips. The size chart shows thigh circumference too, helping you work out which fit is for you (“measure the circumference of the juiciest part of the thigh,” the size chart reassuringly tells you). You should select your size based on measurements, not on your regular clothing size.
The trousers are high rise and sit smoothly under a rucksack waistband. The fabric is lightweight but doesn’t feel flimsy. It’s soft, breathable, and offers UPF40 sun protection. After four days camping and hiking they continued to hold their shape, look good and not smell.
The Ponderosa Pants in the wild. Credit: Mary-Ann Ochota
The belt system is a masterstroke. It’s sewn into the trousers, and adjusts at the side, rather than in the middle. It means a small adjustment cinches the waist in at the small of my back but doesn’t pull across my tum. After multiple days I did find the waist buttonhole stretching a little. Craghoppers solve the same problem by attaching their fly button to webbing that’s sewn into the vertical seam, so it doesn’t stretch the actual trouser fabric. That would be a welcome improvement here.
Deep pockets mean you can actually fit a smartphone or folded map into them. The zipped thigh pocket is particularly useful. Flappy ankles are a perennial problem – even on this painstakingly designed trouser, the hem at the ankle is a bit wider than I’d like. And it’s frustrating that there’s only one leg length. But this is a new company and they’re building their range slowly.
I’m at the smaller end of the fit range, but members of plus-size community Every Body Outdoors who wear a bigger size also report satisfaction on the range of fits.
Mine are orange, which I love, and Alpine Parrot clothing is WRAP Certified, a metric which serves to assure buyers that the clothing is made in a safe, legal and ethical factory. The Ponderosa pants are currently stocked in the UK by plus size focused retailer Vampire Outdoors.
Testing conditions
Mary-Ann Ochota tested these trousers throughout the start of 2024 on hill walks in the South Downs. The review was first published in the August 2024 issue of The Great Outdoors.
This founding member of Every Body Outdoors can finally can sleep easy in the Thermarest Questar sleeping bag.
For those with a larger body, or just people seeking a more spacious bag, the Thermarest Questar is a great choice for a four season sleeping that is still packable and light enough to take on longer trips.
Steph Wetherell highly recommends
As a size 20 woman, finding sleeping bag for the winter months has been a mission. The Questar has solved this issue.
Pros
spacious
very warm
mat connectors
Cons
none
Quick Specs
Price: $409.95 / £360 (available from Cascade Designs) Weight: 1.17kg (small), 1.21kg (regular), 1.38kg (long) Fill: 650 hydrophobic down Shell: 20D Polyester with DWR Zip: eg 2-way full length YKK Auto lock centre Length: 185cm (small), 203cm (regular), 216cm (long) – to fit 168cm (small), 183cm (regular), 198cm (long) Rating: -10C comfort, -18C limit Sizes: Small, regular, long Women/Men’s version: Unisex cascadedesigns.com
As a size 20 woman, finding sleeping bag for the winter months has been a mission. I’ve tried to squash myself into an assortment of bags over the years and never found one that I could turn over inside. It’s not just about comfort either – a tightly fitting bag also stops the down insulation performing properly, undermining the very feature you need in a warm bag. The Thermarest Questar has solved this issue though.
As a cold sleeper, the -10C comfort rating is enough for my winter outings, but the 1.2kg weight and fairly small pack size and well-designed compression sack means that I can still comfortably carry it on multi-day trips if needed. With any down sleeping bag there’s a concern about if the bag gets wet but the 650 Fill Duck Nikwax Hydrophobic Down is designed to absorb a lot less water and dry really quickly. It’s overall a warm bag, backed up by some nice features, including a foot pocket to help warm your feet up (which took me a bit of hunting with my feet to find the first time) and the insulation being zoned around key areas.
Another nice feature is the thick baffle down the zip, and around your neck and the hood, which helps keep you toasty warm when you’re zipped and cinched in. In combination with a decent mat, it’s kept me warm even in sub-zero temperatures (something I’ve historically struggled with), and the down has stayed well distributed even with a good amount of use.
The Thermarest Questar did well in the hills. Credit: Steph Wetherell
The fit is the highlight though. My experience of unisex bags has been that they fit men well, but not so much anyone with hips. However, this one does actually allow a good amount of space around the hip area whilst remining well proportioned from shoulder to feet. The With Additional Room for Multiple positions (W.A.R.M.) fit is designed to be comfortable regardless of what position you sleep in, but also allows extra space for those of us who want or need a few inches more than offered by most sleeping bags. It was spacious enough for me to comfortably turn over inside and for the bag to not be too tight around me.
The zipper was really easy to use and I had no issues with snagging when zipping or unzipping it. One of the best features is the removeable ultralight stretchy straps on the back that allow you to attach the bag to your sleeping mat. This massively improved my overall sleeping experience, ensuring I turned over inside my sleeping bag (instead of it coming with me) and also helping me to stay centred on my mat.
There is a limit to what sized/thickness mat this will work with, but it’s fairly generous and I had no problems with my fairly thick mats.
Testing conditions
Steph used this sleeping bag through the winter and spring months between 2024 and 2025 in South Wales and the South West of England. She is an especially cold sleeper, and plus size (size 20) so requires a warm and spacious sleeping bag.
Login
